PURPOSE: Routine assessment was made of tumor metabolic activity as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This report describes PET correlates prospectively collected after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with medically inoperable NSCLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 14 consecutive patients with medically inoperable Stage I NSCLC were enrolled. All patients received SBRT to 60-66 Gy in three fractions. Patients underwent serial planned FDG-PET/computed tomography fusion imaging before SBRT and at 2, 26, and 52 weeks after SBRT. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 30.2 months, no patients experienced local failure. One patient developed regional failure, 1 developed distant failure, and 1 developed a second primary. The median tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) before SBRT was 8.70. The median SUV(max) values at 2, 26, and 52 weeks after SBRT were 6.04, 2.80, and 3.58, respectively. Patients with low pre-SBRT SUV were more likely to experience initial 2-week rises in SUV, whereas patients with high pre-SBRT SUV commonly had SUV declines 2 weeks after treatment (p = 0.036). Six of 13 patients had primary tumor SUV(max) >3.5 at 12 months after SBRT but remained without evidence of local disease failure on further follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients may have moderately elevated FDG-PET SUV(max) at 12 months without evidence of local failure on further follow-up. Thus, slightly elevated PET SUV(max) should not be considered a surrogate for local treatment failure. Our data do not support routine serial FDG-PET/computed tomography for follow-up of patients receiving SBRT for Stage I NSCLC. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: Routine assessment was made of tumor metabolic activity as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This report describes PET correlates prospectively collected after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with medically inoperable NSCLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 14 consecutive patients with medically inoperable Stage I NSCLC were enrolled. All patients received SBRT to 60-66 Gy in three fractions. Patients underwent serial planned FDG-PET/computed tomography fusion imaging before SBRT and at 2, 26, and 52 weeks after SBRT. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 30.2 months, no patients experienced local failure. One patient developed regional failure, 1 developed distant failure, and 1 developed a second primary. The median tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) before SBRT was 8.70. The median SUV(max) values at 2, 26, and 52 weeks after SBRT were 6.04, 2.80, and 3.58, respectively. Patients with low pre-SBRT SUV were more likely to experience initial 2-week rises in SUV, whereas patients with high pre-SBRT SUV commonly had SUV declines 2 weeks after treatment (p = 0.036). Six of 13 patients had primary tumor SUV(max) >3.5 at 12 months after SBRT but remained without evidence of local disease failure on further follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients may have moderately elevated FDG-PET SUV(max) at 12 months without evidence of local failure on further follow-up. Thus, slightly elevated PET SUV(max) should not be considered a surrogate for local treatment failure. Our data do not support routine serial FDG-PET/computed tomography for follow-up of patients receiving SBRT for Stage I NSCLC. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Rodney J Hicks; Michael P Mac Manus; Jane P Matthews; Annette Hogg; David Binns; Danny Rischin; David L Ball; Lester J Peters Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mark Henderson; Ronald McGarry; Constantin Yiannoutsos; Achilles Fakiris; David Hoopes; Mark Williams; Robert Timmerman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Noah C Choi; Alan J Fischman; Andrzej Niemierko; Jin Sook Ryu; Thomas Lynch; John Wain; Cameron Wright; Panos Fidias; Douglas Mathisen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michael P Mac Manus; Rodney J Hicks; Jane P Matthews; Allan McKenzie; Danny Rischin; Eeva K Salminen; David L Ball Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert Timmerman; Lech Papiez; Ronald McGarry; Laura Likes; Colleen DesRosiers; Stephanie Frost; Mark Williams Journal: Chest Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Devin Coon; Abhay S Gokhale; Steven A Burton; Dwight E Heron; Cihat Ozhasoglu; Neil Christie Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Saloomeh Vahdat; Eric K Oermann; Sean P Collins; Xia Yu; Malak Abedalthagafi; Pedro Debrito; Simeng Suy; Shadi Yousefi; Constanza J Gutierrez; Thomas Chang; Filip Banovac; Eric D Anderson; Giuseppe Esposito; Brian T Collins Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 17.388