Literature DB >> 19473557

Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist. XX. Sonographic assessment of hand and wrist joint involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography.

E Filippucci1, G Meenagh, A Delle Sedie, F Salaffi, L Riente, A Iagnocco, C A Scirè, C Montecucco, S Bombardieri, G Valesini, W Grassi.   

Abstract

In the rheumatology literature, most of the available evidence on three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) is related to the acquisition process and highlights the virtual operator independence and shortening of the US examination time. The main aim of this study was to compare 3D US using a high-frequency volumetric probe and conventional 2D US at the wrist and hand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The 3D US examinations were performed using a Logiq 9 (General Electrics Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) with a high-frequency (8-15 MHz) volumetric probe. Overall, there is good-to-excellent agreement between the two modalities relating to both joint inflammation and bone erosion. This study is an initial step towards establishing a methodology necessary for developing multi-centre US studies which are aimed at assessing hand involvement in patients with RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19473557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol        ISSN: 0392-856X            Impact factor:   4.473


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasonography in inflammatory rheumatic disease: an overview.

Authors:  Michael Schirmer; Christina Duftner; Wolfgang A Schmidt; Christian Dejaco
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional ultrasonographic assessment of peripheral enthesitis in spondylarthritis.

Authors:  Oriane Mérot; Pascale Guillot; Yves Maugars; Benoit Le Goff
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Detection of bone erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis: 3D ultrasonography versus computed tomography.

Authors:  G Peluso; S L Bosello; E Gremese; L Mirone; F Di Gregorio; V Di Molfetta; T Pirronti; G Ferraccioli
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  The evolution of ultrasound in rheumatology.

Authors:  Taeyoung Kang; Stefano Lanni; Jackie Nam; Paul Emery; Richard J Wakefield
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 5.  Progress in imaging in rheumatology.

Authors:  Emilio Filippucci; Luca Di Geso; Walter Grassi
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Level of agreement between three-dimensional volumetric ultrasound and real-time conventional ultrasound in the assessment of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Carlos Acebes; Neil McKay; Anna Ciechomska; Nicola Alcorn; John P Harvie; Barbara Robson; Nico Groenendijk; Moira McDonald; Alison Wilson; Jesus Garrido
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 7.  Role of ultrasound in managing rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Hilde Berner Hammer; Lene Terslev
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  North American musculoskeletal ultrasound scanning protocol of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand: update of a Delphi Consensus Study.

Authors:  Narandra K Bethina; Karina D Torralba; Kristal S Choi; Robert M Fairchild; Amy C Cannella; Lorena Salto; Eugene Y Kissin; Janeth Yinh; Manushi Aggarwal; Ralf Thiele; Midori J Nishio
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 9.  [Ultrasound in rheumatology. What's new?].

Authors:  W Hartung; W A Schmidt
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 10.  Value of ultrasound in rheumatologic diseases.

Authors:  Taeyoung Kang; Laura Horton; Paul Emery; Richard J Wakefield
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.