Literature DB >> 26091903

Detection of bone erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis: 3D ultrasonography versus computed tomography.

G Peluso1, S L Bosello, E Gremese, L Mirone, F Di Gregorio, V Di Molfetta, T Pirronti, G Ferraccioli.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric ultrasonography (US) is an interesting tool that could improve the traditional approach to musculoskeletal US in rheumatology, due to its virtual operator independence and reduced examination time. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of 3DUS in the detection of bone erosions in hand and wrist joints of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients, with computed tomography (CT) as the reference method. Twenty ERA patients without erosions on standard radiography of hands and wrists underwent 3DUS and CT evaluation of eleven joints: radiocarpal, intercarpal, ulnocarpal, second to fifth metacarpo-phalangeal (MCP), and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of dominant hand. Eleven (55.0%) patients were erosive with CT and ten of them were erosive also at 3DUS evaluation. In five patients, 3DUS identified cortical breaks that were not erosions at CT evaluation. Considering CT as the gold standard to identify erosive patients, the 3DUS sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.9, 0.55, 0.71, and 0.83, respectively. A total of 32 erosions were detected with CT, 15 of them were also observed at the same sites with 3DUS, whereas 17 were not seen on 3DUS evaluation. The majority of these 3DUS false-negative erosions were in the wrist joints. Furthermore, 18 erosions recorded by 3DUS were false positive. The majority of these 3DUS false-positive erosions were located at PIP joints. This study underlines the limits of 3DUS in detecting individual bone erosion, mostly at the wrist, despite the good sensitivity in identifying erosive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26091903     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-015-2938-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  27 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-02

Review 2.  Comparison of the efficacy of sonography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional radiography for the detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Athan Baillet; Cécile Gaujoux-Viala; Gaël Mouterde; Thao Pham; Jacques Tebib; Alain Saraux; Bruno Fautrel; Alain Cantagrel; Xavier Le Loët; Philippe Gaudin
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

Authors:  Daniel Aletaha; Tuhina Neogi; Alan J Silman; Julia Funovits; David T Felson; Clifton O Bingham; Neal S Birnbaum; Gerd R Burmester; Vivian P Bykerk; Marc D Cohen; Bernard Combe; Karen H Costenbader; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Johanna M W Hazes; Kathryn Hobbs; Tom W J Huizinga; Arthur Kavanaugh; Jonathan Kay; Tore K Kvien; Timothy Laing; Philip Mease; Henri A Ménard; Larry W Moreland; Raymond L Naden; Theodore Pincus; Josef S Smolen; Ewa Stanislawska-Biernat; Deborah Symmons; Paul P Tak; Katherine S Upchurch; Jirí Vencovsky; Frederick Wolfe; Gillian Hawker
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Validity and reliability of 3D US for the detection of erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using MRI as the gold standard.

Authors:  K Ellegaard; H Bliddal; U Møller Døhn; M Henriksen; M Boesen; R Bouert; B Danneskiold-Samsøe; S Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.548

5.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Backhaus; T Kamradt; D Sandrock; D Loreck; J Fritz; K J Wolf; H Raber; B Hamm; G R Burmester; M Bollow
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-06

6.  Low field dedicated magnetic resonance imaging in untreated rheumatoid arthritis of recent onset.

Authors:  H Lindegaard; J Vallø; K Hørslev-Petersen; P Junker; M Østergaard
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression.

Authors:  A K Brown; M A Quinn; Z Karim; P G Conaghan; C G Peterfy; E Hensor; R J Wakefield; P J O'Connor; P Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-12

8.  Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Philip G Conaghan; Philip O'Connor; Dennis McGonagle; Paul Astin; Richard J Wakefield; Wayne W Gibbon; Mark Quinn; Zunaid Karim; Michael J Green; Susanna Proudman; John Isaacs; Paul Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-01

9.  Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints.

Authors:  Uffe Møller Døhn; Bo J Ejbjerg; Michel Court-Payen; Maria Hasselquist; Eva Narvestad; Marcin Szkudlarek; Jakob M Møller; Henrik S Thomsen; Mikkel Østergaard
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Monitoring cartilage loss in the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis with magnetic resonance imaging in a multi-center clinical trial: IMPRESS (NCT00425932).

Authors:  Charles G Peterfy; Ewa Olech; Julie C DiCarlo; Joan T Merrill; Peter J Countryman; Norman B Gaylis
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers to guide clinical therapeutics in rheumatology?

Authors:  William H Robinson; Rong Mao
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  A descriptive, cross-sectional study characterizing bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis and gout by ultrasound.

Authors:  Lucio Ventura-Ríos; Cristina Hernández-Díaz; Guadalupe Sanchez-Bringas; Eduardo Madrigal-Santillán; José Antonio Morales-González; Carlos Pineda
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for detecting bone erosion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Haozheng Tang; Xinhua Qu; Bing Yue
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  The sonographic identification of cortical bone interruptions in rheumatoid arthritis: a morphological approach.

Authors:  Edoardo Cipolletta; Gianluca Smerilli; Andrea Di Matteo; Jacopo Di Battista; Marco Di Carlo; Walter Grassi; Emilio Filippucci
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Pseudoerosions of Hands and Feet in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Anatomic Concepts and Redefinition.

Authors:  Lena Hirtler; Claus Rath; Hannes Platzgummer; Daniel Aletaha; Franz Kainberger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.