Literature DB >> 19472969

In vivo adduction and reverse axial rotation (external) of the tibial component can be minimized.

Stephen M Howell1, Esther E Hodapp, Kyle Kuznik, Maury L Hull.   

Abstract

Mechanical alignment with conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) instruments often requires collateral ligament releases, which result in a high prevalence of adduction and reverse axial rotation (external rotation) of the tibial component during knee flexion with a variety of component designs. We used a radiographic image-matching technique to determine the contact kinematics during standing and kneeling at 90 degrees and maximum flexion in a series of 35 patients in which a new image-guided, custom cutting block system was used to kinematically align a cruciate-retaining prosthesis with the intent of restoring the 3 kinematic axes of the knee. The kinematically aligned prosthesis had a minimal prevalence of adduction (3%) and reverse axial rotation (8.5%). The anteroposterior contact positions of the lateral and medial femoral condyles did not edge load the tibial liner. The moderate association between abduction and internal rotation, the degree of knee flexion, and the contact position of the medial femoral condyle suggest that abduction was not a sign of lift-off of the medial femoral condyle, but the result of the medial femoral condyle moving up the anterior slope of the tibial liner. These more normal contact kinematics were achieved without release of the collateral ligaments or lateral retinaculum. In contrast to mechanical alignment with conventional surgical techniques, the use of kinematic alignment with custom-fit cutting guides and a cruciate-retaining, symmetric medial and lateral femoral-tibial bearing surface minimizes the undesirable consequences of adduction and reverse axial rotation (external rotation).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19472969     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090501-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  9 in total

1.  Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Does it really matter?

Authors:  Raju Karuppal
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Sébastien Parratte; Guillaume Blanc; Matthieu Ollivier; Vincent Pomero; Elke Viehweger; Jean-Noël A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Are undesirable contact kinematics minimized after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? An intersurgeon analysis of consecutive patients.

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Esther E Hodapp; Joseph V Vernace; Maury L Hull; Thomas D Meade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Handheld Navigation Device and Patient-Specific Cutting Guides Result in Similar Coronal Alignment for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael E Steinhaus; Alexander S McLawhorn; Shawn S Richardson; Patrick Maher; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Erin L Ruh; Brandon M Williams; Keith Foreman; Adrienne D Ford; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Longitudinal shapes of the tibia and femur are unrelated and variable.

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Kyle Kuznik; Maury L Hull; Robert A Siston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The Effect of Femoral Cutting Guide Design Improvements for Patient-Specific Instruments.

Authors:  Oh-Ryong Kwon; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Juhyun Son; Yun-Jin Choi; Dong-Suk Suh; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.