Literature DB >> 19472169

Varying cluster sizes in trials with clusters in one treatment arm: sample size adjustments when testing treatment effects with linear mixed models.

Math J J M Candel1, Gerard J P Van Breukelen.   

Abstract

Trials in which treatments induce clustering of observations in one of two treatment arms, such as when comparing group therapy with pharmacological treatment or with a waiting-list group, are examined with respect to the efficiency loss caused by varying cluster sizes. When observations are (approximately) normally distributed, treatment effects can be estimated and tested through linear mixed model analysis. For maximum likelihood estimation, the asymptotic relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes is derived. In an extensive Monte Carlo simulation for small sample sizes, the asymptotic relative efficiency turns out to be accurate for the treatment effect, but less accurate for the random intercept variance. For the treatment effect, the efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes rarely exceeds 10 per cent, which can be regained by recruiting 11 per cent more clusters for one arm and 11 per cent more persons for the other. For the intercept variance the loss can be 16 per cent, which requires recruiting 19 per cent more clusters for one arm, with no additional recruitment of subjects for the other arm. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19472169     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Multilevel factorial designs with experiment-induced clustering.

Authors:  Inbal Nahum-Shani; John J Dziak; Linda M Collins
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-04-06

3.  Cost-efficient designs for three-arm trials with treatment delivered by health professionals: Sample sizes for a combination of nested and crossed designs.

Authors:  Mirjam Moerbeek
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jane Candlish; M Dawn Teare; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Laura Flight; Laura Mandefield; Stephen J Walters
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Design and analysis of trials with a partially nested design and a binary outcome measure.

Authors:  Chris Roberts; Evridiki Batistatou; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Enhancing Early Engagement (E3) in mental health services training for children's advocacy center's victim advocates: feasibility protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Erin K Taylor; Alex R Dopp; Kaitlin Lounsbury; Yutian Thompson; Michelle Miller; Ashley Jorgensen; Jane F Silovsky
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-12-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.