Literature DB >> 28383950

Multilevel factorial designs with experiment-induced clustering.

Inbal Nahum-Shani1, John J Dziak2, Linda M Collins3.   

Abstract

Factorial experimental designs have many applications in the behavioral sciences. In the context of intervention development, factorial experiments play a critical role in building and optimizing high-quality, multicomponent behavioral interventions. One challenge in implementing factorial experiments in the behavioral sciences is that individuals are often clustered in social or administrative units and may be more similar to each other than to individuals in other clusters. This means that data are dependent within clusters. Power planning resources are available for factorial experiments in which the multilevel structure of the data is due to individuals' membership in groups that existed before experimentation. However, in many cases clusters are generated in the course of the study itself. Such experiment-induced clustering (EIC) requires different data analysis models and power planning resources from those available for multilevel experimental designs in which clusters exist prior to experimentation. Despite the common occurrence of both experimental designs with EIC and factorial designs, a bridge has yet to be built between EIC and factorial designs. Therefore, resources are limited or nonexistent for planning factorial experiments that involve EIC. This article seeks to bridge this gap by extending prior models for EIC, developed for single-factor experiments, to factorial experiments involving various types of EIC. We also offer power formulas to help investigators decide whether a particular experimental design involving EIC is feasible. We demonstrate that factorial experiments can be powerful and feasible even with EIC. We discuss design considerations and directions for future research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28383950      PMCID: PMC5630520          DOI: 10.1037/met0000128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  37 in total

1.  Evaluating models for partially clustered designs.

Authors:  Scott A Baldwin; Daniel J Bauer; Eric Stice; Paul Rohde
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-06

2.  Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment.

Authors:  Chris Roberts; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Christina N Benac; Melissa S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Corrigendum to "Optimization of remotely delivered intensive lifestyle treatment for obesity using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy: Opt-IN study protocol" [Contemp. Clin. Trials 38 (2014) 251-259].

Authors:  Christine A Pellegrini; Sara A Hoffman; Linda M Collins; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Making the connection: randomized controlled trial of social skills at school for children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Connie Kasari; Erin Rotheram-Fuller; Jill Locke; Amanda Gulsrud
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 8.982

6.  Sample size requirements and length of study for testing interaction in a 2 x k factorial design when time-to-failure is the outcome [corrected].

Authors:  B Peterson; S L George
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1993-12

7.  Group cognitive behavior therapy or social skills training for individuals with a recent onset of psychosis? Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tania Lecomte; Claude Leclerc; Marc Corbière; Til Wykes; Charles J Wallace; Alicia Spidel
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.254

8.  Skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation followed by exposure: a phase-based treatment for PTSD related to childhood abuse.

Authors:  Marylene Cloitre; Karestan C Koenen; Lisa R Cohen; Hyemee Han
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-10

9.  Experience of affects predicting sense of self and others in short-term dynamic and cognitive therapy.

Authors:  Lene Berggraf; Pål G Ulvenes; Tuva Oktedalen; Asle Hoffart; Tore Stiles; Leigh McCullough; Bruce E Wampold
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2014-06

10.  Comparative effectiveness of motivation phase intervention components for use with smokers unwilling to quit: a factorial screening experiment.

Authors:  Jessica W Cook; Linda M Collins; Michael C Fiore; Stevens S Smith; David Fraser; Daniel M Bolt; Timothy B Baker; Megan E Piper; Tanya R Schlam; Douglas Jorenby; Wei-Yin Loh; Robin Mermelstein
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  5 in total

1.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) in child maltreatment prevention research.

Authors:  Kate Guastaferro; Jillian C Strayhorn; Linda M Collins
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2021-08-05

Review 2.  One view of the next decade of research on behavioral and biobehavioral approaches to cancer prevention and control: intervention optimization.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Jillian C Strayhorn; David J Vanness
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Evaluating the efficacy of mindfulness and acceptance-based treatment components for weight loss: Protocol for a multiphase optimization strategy trial.

Authors:  Evan M Forman; Christina Chwyl; Michael P Berry; Lauren C Taylor; Meghan L Butryn; Donna L Coffman; Adrienne Juarascio; Stephanie M Manasse
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Optimization of a new adaptive intervention using the SMART Design to increase COVID-19 testing among people at high risk in an urban community.

Authors:  Liliane Windsor; Ellen Benoit; Rogério M Pinto; Jesus Sarol
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.728

5.  MCMTC: A Pragmatic Framework for Selecting an Experimental Design to Inform the Development of Digital Interventions.

Authors:  Inbal Nahum-Shani; John J Dziak; David W Wetter
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-03-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.