Literature DB >> 19471975

Kinetoplastid RNA editing ligases 1 and 2 exhibit different electrostatic properties.

Alireza Shaneh1, Reza Salavati.   

Abstract

Kinetoplastid RNA editing ligases 1 and 2 (KREL1 and KREL2) share a significant degree of sequence homology. However, biochemical experiments have reported that KREL1 and KREL2 differ in their functional roles during the RNA editing process. In this study, we hypothesize that dissimilar roles for KREL1 and KREL2 proteins arise from their different physicochemical characteristics. To test our hypothesis at sequence level, we plotted theoretical titration curves for KREL1, KREL2 and their binding partner proteins. The plots showed a lower isoelectric point for KREL1 compared to that for KREL2 as well as more relative alkalinity and acidity for binding partner proteins of KREL1 and KREL2 at net charge zero, respectively. At structure level, based on the available high resolution structure of KREL1 N-terminal domain and strong sequence similarity between KRELs and other ligases, we built the homology model of KREL2 N-terminal domain. Using Poisson-Boltzmann continuum approach, we calculated the electrostatic potential isosurfaces of KREL1 structure and KREL2 model. KREL1 and KREL2 coordinates differed in their electrostatic isopotential patterns. A wider negative patch on the surface of KREL1 suggests differential affinity for another protein compared to KREL2. In contrast, a larger positive patch on the KREL2 surface predicts its differential affinity and/or specificity for its RNA substrate. Subsequently, we employed in silico mutational scanning and identified the surface-exposed residues contributing to the long-range electrostatic energy of KRELs. We predict that two structurally conserved loops of KRELs, not previously reported in the literature, also recognize their RNA substrates. Our results provide important information about the physicochemical properties of RNA editing ligases that could contribute to the ligation step of RNA editing.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19471975     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-009-0506-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  46 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  C Notredame; D G Higgins; J Heringa
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-09-08       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Kinetoplastid RNA editing ligases: complex association, characterization, and substrate requirements.

Authors:  Setareh S Palazzo; Aswini K Panigrahi; Robert P Igo; Reza Salavati; Kenneth Stuart
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Distinct functions of two RNA ligases in active Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complexes.

Authors:  Jorge Cruz-Reyes; Alevtina G Zhelonkina; Catherine E Huang; Barbara Sollner-Webb
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Mitochondrial proteins and complexes in Leishmania and Trypanosoma involved in U-insertion/deletion RNA editing.

Authors:  Larry Simpson; Ruslan Aphasizhev; Guanghan Gao; Xuedong Kang
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Reconstitution of full-round uridine-deletion RNA editing with three recombinant proteins.

Authors:  Xuedong Kang; Guanghan Gao; Kestrel Rogers; Arnold M Falick; Sharleen Zhou; Larry Simpson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A 100-kD complex of two RNA-binding proteins from mitochondria of Leishmania tarentolae catalyzes RNA annealing and interacts with several RNA editing components.

Authors:  Ruslan Aphasizhev; Inna Aphasizheva; Robert E Nelson; Larry Simpson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 8.  Natural and induced dyskinetoplastic trypanosomatids: how to live without mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Achim Schnaufer; Gonzalo J Domingo; Ken Stuart
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.981

9.  Functional and structural insights revealed by molecular dynamics simulations of an essential RNA editing ligase in Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  Rommie E Amaro; Robert V Swift; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2007-11-14

10.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Naphthalene-based RNA editing inhibitor blocks RNA editing activities and editosome assembly in Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  Houtan Moshiri; Stéphane Acoca; Smriti Kala; Hamed Shateri Najafabadi; Hervé Hogues; Enrico Purisima; Reza Salavati
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Mutational analysis of Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing ligase reveals regions critical for interaction with KREPA2.

Authors:  Vaibhav Mehta; Rajashree Sen; Houtan Moshiri; Reza Salavati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.