Literature DB >> 19471138

Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation: DOES AGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

Sherry L Grace1, Shamila Shanmugasegaram, Shannon Gravely-Witte, Janette Brual, Neville Suskin, Donna E Stewart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantitatively investigate age differences in barriers to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) enrollment and participation.
METHODS: Cardiac outpatients (N = 1,273, mean age = 65.9 +/- 11.2) completed a mailed survey to discern barriers to CR enrollment and participation. Both enrollees and nonenrollees were asked to rate 18 CR barriers on a 5-point Likert scale.
RESULTS: Of the respondents, 535 (43%) reported participating in CR at 1 of 40 sites, with younger patients being more likely to participate (P = .002). Older age was positively related to total CR barriers (P < .001). Older patients more strongly endorsed the following CR barriers: already exercising at home (P = .001), confidence in ability to self-manage their condition (P = .003), perception of exercise as tiring or painful (P = .001), not knowing about CR (P = .001), lack of physician encouragement (P < .001), comorbidities (P < .001), and perception that CR would not improve their health (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Given that the benefits of CR are achieved in older patients as well as the young, interventions to overcome these modifiable barriers to enrollment and participation are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19471138      PMCID: PMC2928243          DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181a3333c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev        ISSN: 1932-7501            Impact factor:   2.081


  13 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac rehabilitation in the elderly.

Authors:  S K Pasquali; K P Alexander; E D Peterson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on the recovery outcomes of older adults after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Mary A Dolansky; Shirley M Moore
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.081

3.  Barriers to participation in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation programme.

Authors:  Y M W Mak; W K Chan; C S S Yue
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.227

4.  Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation participation in older coronary patients.

Authors:  P A Ades; M L Waldmann; W J McCann; S O Weaver
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-05

5.  Women and cardiac rehabilitation after heart surgery: patterns of referral and adherence.

Authors:  Sandra K Plach
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.625

6.  Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training in secondary coronary prevention in the elderly.

Authors:  C J Lavie; R V Milani; A B Littman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation referral: a prospective multilevel study.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Lyall Higginson; David Alter; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-06-10

8.  Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Alexandra Evindar; Tabitha N Kung; Patricia E Scholey; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A F Cooper; G Jackson; J Weinman; R Horne
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.477

10.  Cardiac rehabilitation II: referral and participation.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Susan E Abbey; Zachary M Shnek; Jane Irvine; Renée Louise Franche; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.238

View more
  27 in total

1.  Geographic issues in cardiac rehabilitation utilization: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yvonne W Leung; Janette Brual; Alison Macpherson; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 2.  Narrative review comparing the benefits of and participation in cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries.

Authors:  Karam I Turk-Adawi; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.975

3.  Symptom clusters and health-related quality of life in people with chronic stable angina.

Authors:  Laura P Kimble; Sandra B Dunbar; William S Weintraub; Deborah B McGuire; Sharon F Manzo; Ora L Strickland
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 4.  Growing Relevance of Cardiac Rehabilitation for an Older Population With Heart Failure.

Authors:  David W Schopfer; Daniel E Forman
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Perceived return-to-work pressure following cardiovascular disease is associated with age, sex, and diagnosis: a nationwide combined survey- and register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Sidsel Marie Bernt Jørgensen; Nina Føns Johnsen; Thomas Alexander Gerds; Stig Brøndum; Thomas Maribo; Gunnar Gislason; Maria Kristiansen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.135

Review 6.  Never Too Old for Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Deirdre O'Neill; Daniel E Forman
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.076

7.  Use of text messages to increase positive affect and promote physical activity in patients with heart disease: The Promoting Activity in Cardiac Patients via Text Messages (PACT) pilot study.

Authors:  Sean Legler; Christopher M Celano; Eleanor E Beale; Bettina B Hoeppner; Jeff C Huffman
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2018-01-18

8.  Sociodemographic Predictors in Failure to Complete Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Behzad Heydarpour; Mozhgan Saeidi; Parvin Ezzati; Ali Soroush; Saeid Komasi
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-12-29

9.  Cardiac Rehabilitation: Underrecognized/Underutilized.

Authors:  Barry A Franklin; Jenna Brinks
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-12

10.  Psychometric validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale.

Authors:  Shamila Shanmugasegaram; Lucia Gagliese; Paul Oh; Donna E Stewart; Stephanie J Brister; Victoria Chan; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.477

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.