Literature DB >> 16340024

Barriers to participation in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation programme.

Y M W Mak1, W K Chan, C S S Yue.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify barriers to participation in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation programme and measures that may enhance participation.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Regional hospital, Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Cardiac patients recruited for a phase I cardiac rehabilitation programme from July 2002 to January 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reasons for not participating in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation programme.
RESULTS: Of the 193 patients recruited for a phase I cardiac rehabilitation programme, 152 (79%) patients, with a mean age of 70.3 years (standard deviation, 11.9 years), did not proceed to phase II programme. Eleven (7%) deaths occurred before commencement of phase II and 74 (49%) patients were considered physically unfit. Reasons for the latter included fractures, pain, or degenerative changes in the lower limbs (24%), and co-morbidities such as cerebrovascular accident (19%), chronic renal failure (11%), congestive heart failure (9%), and unstable angina (8%). Phase II rehabilitation was postponed until after completion of scheduled cardiac interventions in 13% of patients. Failure of physicians to arrange the pre-phase II exercise stress test as per protocol was reported in 7% of patients. Other reasons were reported: work or time conflicts (16%), non-compliance with cardiac treatment (5%), financial constraints (4%), self-exercise (3%), fear after exercise stress testing (3%), and patients returning to their original cardiologists for treatment (3%).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant (79%) proportion of patients did not proceed to a phase II cardiac rehabilitation programme for a variety of reasons. These included physical unfitness, work or time conflicts, and need to attend scheduled cardiac interventions. Further studies are required to determine how to overcome obstacles to cardiac rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16340024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hong Kong Med J        ISSN: 1024-2708            Impact factor:   2.227


  6 in total

1.  Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation: DOES AGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Shamila Shanmugasegaram; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

2.  A multisite examination of sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers by participation status.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Sheena Kayaniyil; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Motivational factors of adherence to cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Hooman Shahsavari; Mohsen Shahriari; Nasrollah Alimohammadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-05

4.  Real-Time Monitoring in Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Using Wrist-Worn Heart Rate Devices.

Authors:  Javier Medina Quero; María Rosa Fernández Olmo; María Dolores Peláez Aguilera; Macarena Espinilla Estévez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Physician factors affecting cardiac rehabilitation referral and patient enrollment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela L M Ghisi; Peter Polyzotis; Paul Oh; Maureen Pakosh; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Obstacles and alternative options for cardiac rehabilitation in Nanjing, China: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Hong Jin; Qin Wei; Long Chen; Qin Sun; Yun Zhang; Juan Wu; Genshan Ma; Naifeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.298

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.