Literature DB >> 18542104

Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation referral: a prospective multilevel study.

Sherry L Grace1, Shannon Gravely-Witte, Janette Brual, Neville Suskin, Lyall Higginson, David Alter, Donna E Stewart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR), in most developed countries, is a proven means of reducing mortality but it is grossly underutilized owing to factors involving both the health system and patients. These issues have not been investigated concurrently. To this end, we employed a hierarchical design to investigate physician and patient factors that affect verified CR referral.
METHODS: This study was prospective with a multilevel design. We assessed 1,490 outpatients with coronary artery disease attending 97 cardiology practices. Cardiologists completed a survey about attitudes to CR referral. Outpatients were surveyed prospectively to assess sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral, psychosocial and health system factors that affected CR referral. Responses were analyzed by mixed logistic regression analyses. After 9 months, CR referral was verified at 40 centers.
RESULTS: Health-care providers referred 550 (43.4%) outpatients to CR. Factors affecting verified referral included positive physician perceptions of CR (P = 0.03), short distance to the closest CR site (P = 0.003), the perception of fewer barriers to CR (P < 0.001) and a sense of personal control over their condition by the patient (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Physician-related and patient-related factors both contribute to CR referral. The most relevant physician perceptions of such programs are program quality and perceived benefit. For patients, the most relevant factors are perceived barriers to CR, which might be conveyed during prereferral discussions. Work to improve physicians' perceptions and patients' understanding might improve use of rehabilitation services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18542104      PMCID: PMC2935488          DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio1272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1743-4297


  29 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

Review 3.  Home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with centre-based rehabilitation and usual care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kate Jolly; Rod S Taylor; Gregory Y H Lip; Andrew Stevens
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Physical Therapy Association, Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Inter-American Heart Foundation, National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Randal J Thomas; Marjorie King; Karen Lui; Neil Oldridge; Ileana L Piña; John Spertus; Robert O Bonow; N A Mark Estes; David C Goff; Kathleen L Grady; Ann R Hiniker; Frederick A Masoudi; Martha J Radford; John S Rumsfeld; Gayle R Whitman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Improving uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation: literature review.

Authors:  Andrew D Beswick; Karen Rees; Robert R West; Fiona C Taylor; Margaret Burke; Ingolf Griebsch; Rod S Taylor; Jackie Victory; Jacqueline Brown; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Cardiac rehabilitation: socially deprived patients are less likely to attend but patients ineligible for thrombolysis are less likely to be invited.

Authors:  M R Melville; C Packham; N Brown; C Weston; D Gray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Providers' perceptions of factors affecting women's referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Lisa Benz Scott; Jerilyn K Allen
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.081

8.  Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: a cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  R S Taylor; A Watt; H M Dalal; P H Evans; J L Campbell; K L Q Read; A J Mourant; Jenny Wingham; D R Thompson; D J Pereira Gray
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  A prospective comparison of cardiac rehabilitation enrollment following automatic vs usual referral.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Patricia Scholey; Neville Suskin; Heather M Arthur; Dina Brooks; Susan Jaglal; Beth L Abramson; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Alexandra Evindar; Tabitha N Kung; Patricia E Scholey; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  21 in total

1.  A simultaneous test of the relationship between identified psychosocial risk factors and recurrent events in coronary artery disease patients.

Authors:  Keerat Grewal; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Donna E Stewart; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2011-07

2.  Geographic issues in cardiac rehabilitation utilization: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yvonne W Leung; Janette Brual; Alison Macpherson; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation: DOES AGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Shamila Shanmugasegaram; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 4.  Effects of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on referral and enrollment rates.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely-Witte; Yvonne W Leung; Rajiv Nariani; Hala Tamim; Paul Oh; Victoria M Chan; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes: impact of comorbidities and age.

Authors:  Jennifer Listerman; Vera Bittner; Bonnie K Sanderson; Todd M Brown
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.081

6.  A multisite examination of sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers by participation status.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Sheena Kayaniyil; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Equity of access to cardiac rehabilitation: the role of system factors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Stewart Williams; Julie E Byles; Kerry J Inder
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2010-01-21

8.  Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation referral in coronary artery disease patients: findings from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program.

Authors:  Todd M Brown; Adrian F Hernandez; Vera Bittner; Christopher P Cannon; Gray Ellrodt; Li Liang; Eric D Peterson; Ileana L Piña; Monika M Safford; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Sociodemographic Predictors in Failure to Complete Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Behzad Heydarpour; Mozhgan Saeidi; Parvin Ezzati; Ali Soroush; Saeid Komasi
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-12-29

10.  The association among depressive symptoms, smoking status and antidepressant use in cardiac outpatients.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely-Witte; Donna E Stewart; Neville Suskin; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.