Literature DB >> 19469677

Statistical tools to analyze continuous glucose monitor data.

William Clarke1, Boris Kovatchev.   

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) generate data streams that are both complex and voluminous. The analyses of these data require an understanding of the physical, biochemical, and mathematical properties involved in this technology. This article describes several methods that are pertinent to the analysis of CGM data, taking into account the specifics of the continuous monitoring data streams. These methods include: (1) evaluating the numerical and clinical accuracy of CGM. We distinguish two types of accuracy metrics-numerical and clinical-each having two subtypes measuring point and trend accuracy. The addition of trend accuracy, e.g., the ability of CGM to reflect the rate and direction of blood glucose (BG) change, is unique to CGM as these new devices are capable of capturing BG not only episodically, but also as a process in time. (2) Statistical approaches for interpreting CGM data. The importance of recognizing that the basic unit for most analyses is the glucose trace of an individual, i.e., a time-stamped series of glycemic data for each person, is stressed. We discuss the use of risk assessment, as well as graphical representation of the data of a person via glucose and risk traces and Poincaré plots, and at a group level via Control Variability-Grid Analysis. In summary, a review of methods specific to the analysis of CGM data series is presented, together with some new techniques. These methods should facilitate the extraction of information from, and the interpretation of, complex and voluminous CGM time series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19469677      PMCID: PMC2903980          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2008.0138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  19 in total

1.  Use of fourier models for analysis and interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring glucose profiles.

Authors:  Michael Miller; Poul Strange
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09

2.  Optimum subcutaneous glucose sampling and fourier analysis of continuous glucose monitors.

Authors:  Marc D Breton; Devin P Shields; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

3.  Symmetrization of the blood glucose measurement scale and its applications.

Authors:  B P Kovatchev; D J Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Evaluating the clinical accuracy of two continuous glucose sensors using continuous glucose-error grid analysis.

Authors:  William L Clarke; Stacey Anderson; Leon Farhy; Marc Breton; Linda Gonder-Frederick; Daniel Cox; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Quantifying temporal glucose variability in diabetes via continuous glucose monitoring: mathematical methods and clinical application.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; William L Clarke; Marc Breton; Kenneth Brayman; Anthony McCall
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 7.  Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Methods for quantifying self-monitoring blood glucose profiles exemplified by an examination of blood glucose patterns in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Daniel J Cox; Linda Gonder-Frederick; William L Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Algorithmic evaluation of metabolic control and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes using self-monitoring blood glucose data.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Daniel J Cox; Anand Kumar; Linda Gonder-Frederick; William L Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  80 in total

Review 1.  The challenges of measuring glycemic variability.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-01

2.  Impact of blood glucose self-monitoring errors on glucose variability, risk for hypoglycemia, and average glucose control in type 1 diabetes: an in silico study.

Authors:  Marc D Breton; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

Review 3.  Measures of glycemic variability and links with psychological functioning.

Authors:  Joseph R Rausch
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Are Risk Indices Derived From CGM Interchangeable With SMBG-Based Indices?

Authors:  Chiara Fabris; Stephen D Patek; Marc D Breton
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-14

5.  Report from IPITA-TTS Opinion Leaders Meeting on the Future of β-Cell Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen T Bartlett; James F Markmann; Paul Johnson; Olle Korsgren; Bernhard J Hering; David Scharp; Thomas W H Kay; Jonathan Bromberg; Jon S Odorico; Gordon C Weir; Nancy Bridges; Raja Kandaswamy; Peter Stock; Peter Friend; Mitsukazu Gotoh; David K C Cooper; Chung-Gyu Park; Phillip OʼConnell; Cherie Stabler; Shinichi Matsumoto; Barbara Ludwig; Pratik Choudhary; Boris Kovatchev; Michael R Rickels; Megan Sykes; Kathryn Wood; Kristy Kraemer; Albert Hwa; Edward Stanley; Camillo Ricordi; Mark Zimmerman; Julia Greenstein; Eduard Montanya; Timo Otonkoski
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Clinical requirements for closed-loop control systems.

Authors:  William L Clarke; Eric Renard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 7.  Assessing the analytical performance of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose: concepts of performance evaluation and definition of metrological key terms.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; Rolf Hinzmann; Bernd Kulzer; Guido Freckmann; Michael Erbach; Volker Lodwig; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

8.  A Review of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Composite Metrics for Glycemic Control.

Authors:  Michelle Nguyen; Julia Han; Elias K Spanakis; Boris P Kovatchev; David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Effect of BGM Accuracy on the Clinical Performance of CGM: An In-Silico Study.

Authors:  Enrique Campos-Náñez; Marc D Breton
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-31

10.  Evaluating the accuracy and large inaccuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Lalantha Leelarathna; Marianna Nodale; Janet M Allen; Daniela Elleri; Kavita Kumareswaran; Ahmad Haidar; Karen Caldwell; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Carlo L Acerini; Mark L Evans; Helen R Murphy; David B Dunger; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.