Literature DB >> 22538159

Clinical requirements for closed-loop control systems.

William L Clarke1, Eric Renard.   

Abstract

Closed-loop (CL) therapy systems should be safe, efficacious, and easily manageable for type 1 diabetes mellitus patient use. For the first two clinical requirements, noninferiority and superiority criteria must be determined based on current conventional and intensive therapy outcomes. Current frequencies of hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis are reviewed and safety expectations for CL therapy systems are proposed. Glycosylated hemoglobin levels lower than current American Diabetes Association recommendations for different age groups are proposed as superiority criteria. Measures of glycemic variability are described and the recording of blood glucose levels as percentages within, above, and below a target range are suggested as reasonable alternatives to sophisticated statistical analyses. It is also suggested that Diabetes Quality of Life and Fear of Hypoglycemia surveys should be used to track psychobehavioral outcomes. Manageability requirements for safe and effective clinical management of CL systems are worth being underscored. The weakest part of the infusion system remains the catheter, which is exposed to variable and under-delivery incidents. Detection methods are needed to warn both the system and the patient about altered insulin delivery, including internal pressure and flow alarms. Glucose monitor sensor accuracy is another requirement; it includes the definition of conditions that lead to capillary glucose measurement, eventually followed by sensor recalibration or replacement. The crucial clinical requirement will be a thorough definition of the situations when the patient needs to move from CL to manual management of insulin delivery, or inversely can switch back to CL after a requested interruption. Instructions about these actions will constitute a major part of the education process of the patients before using CL systems and contribute to the manageability of these systems.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538159      PMCID: PMC3380791          DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  45 in total

1.  Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it?

Authors:  Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David R Owens
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

2.  Nocturnal hypoglycemia detected with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Francine Ratner Kaufman; Juliana Austin; Aaron Neinstein; Lily Jeng; Mary Halvorson; Debra J Devoe; Pisit Pitukcheewanont
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). The DCCT Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Frequency and predictors of hypoglycaemia in Type 1 and insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: a population-based study.

Authors:  L A Donnelly; A D Morris; B M Frier; J D Ellis; P T Donnan; R Durrant; M M Band; G Reekie; G P Leese
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Long-acting insulin analogs and the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a prospective study of 10,682 patients from 271 institutions.

Authors:  Beate Karges; Thomas Kapellen; Andreas Neu; Sabine E Hofer; Tilman Rohrer; Joachim Rosenbauer; Johannes Wolf; Reinhard W Holl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Glycemic control in youth with diabetes: the SEARCH for diabetes in Youth Study.

Authors:  Diana B Petitti; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Ronny A Bell; Jeanette S Andrews; Dana Dabelea; Giuseppina Imperatore; Santica Marcovina; Catherine Pihoker; Debra Standiford; Beth Waitzfelder; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 7.  A critical review of the literature on fear of hypoglycemia in diabetes: Implications for diabetes management and patient education.

Authors:  Diane Wild; Robyn von Maltzahn; Elaine Brohan; Torsten Christensen; Per Clauson; Linda Gonder-Frederick
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-06-19

8.  Risk of hypoglycaemia in types 1 and 2 diabetes: effects of treatment modalities and their duration.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Reducing rates of severe hypoglycemia in a population-based cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes over the decade 2000-2009.

Authors:  Susan M O'Connell; Matthew N Cooper; Max K Bulsara; Elizabeth A Davis; Timothy W Jones
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Artificial pancreas: past, present, future.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Eric Renard; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  5 in total

1.  Utilization of blood glucose data in patient education.

Authors:  Yaa Kumah-Crystal; Shelagh Mulvaney
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Psychosocial assessment of artificial pancreas (AP): commentary and review of existing measures and their applicability in AP research.

Authors:  Katharine D Barnard; Korey K Hood; Jill Weissberg-Benchell; Chris Aldred; Nick Oliver; Lori Laffel
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Challenges and Recent Progress in the Development of a Closed-loop Artificial Pancreas.

Authors:  B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  Annu Rev Control       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.091

Review 4.  A Review of Safety and Design Requirements of the Artificial Pancreas.

Authors:  Helga Blauw; Patrick Keith-Hynes; Robin Koops; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Outcome Measures for Artificial Pancreas Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report.

Authors:  David M Maahs; Bruce A Buckingham; Jessica R Castle; Ali Cinar; Edward R Damiano; Eyal Dassau; J Hans DeVries; Francis J Doyle; Steven C Griffen; Ahmad Haidar; Lutz Heinemann; Roman Hovorka; Timothy W Jones; Craig Kollman; Boris Kovatchev; Brian L Levy; Revital Nimri; David N O'Neal; Moshe Philip; Eric Renard; Steven J Russell; Stuart A Weinzimer; Howard Zisser; John W Lum
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 19.112

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.