Literature DB >> 19469587

Effects of synthetic gestagens on fish reproduction.

Jana Zeilinger1, Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Edmund Maser, Stephan Goller, Richardus Vonk, Reinhard Länge.   

Abstract

Although it is well known that estrogenic steroidal hormones are able to affect the sexual development and reproduction of fish at low concentrations, no data on environmental effects of the class of progestogenic hormones are available yet. Synthetic gestagens (progestins) are a component in oral contraceptives. Upon their use, a fraction of the progestins will be excreted via urine into the aquatic environment. On the basis of their pharmacological action in mammals, it is supposed that fish reproduction is the most sensitive endpoint for the progestin treatment. In order to test this assumption, the effects of two progestins currently marketed in contraceptive formulations, levonorgestrel (LNG) and drospirenone (DRSP), were investigated in adult fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) following an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 21-d fish reproduction screening assay draft protocol with additional end points. Levonorgestrel was tested at measured concentrations of 0.8, 3.3, and 29.6 ng/L, and DRSP at concentrations of 0.66, 6.5, and 70 microg/L. Both tested progestins caused an inhibition of reproduction. For LNG, this occurred at concentrations of >or=0.8 ng/L, no no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) could be defined. Higher concentrations resulted in masculinization of females with de novo synthesis of nuptial tubercles. Drospirenone treatment, however, affected the reproductive success of fathead minnow at concentrations of 6.5 microg/L and higher with a clear dose-response relationship and a NOEC of 0.66 microg/L, which is above environmentally relevant concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19469587     DOI: 10.1897/08-485.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  21 in total

1.  An assessment of endocrine activity in Australian rivers using chemical and in vitro analyses.

Authors:  Philip D Scott; Michael Bartkow; Stephen J Blockwell; Heather M Coleman; Stuart J Khan; Richard Lim; James A McDonald; Helen Nice; Dayanthi Nugegoda; Vincent Pettigrove; Louis A Tremblay; Michael St J Warne; Frederic D L Leusch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.

Authors:  Katherine K Coady; Ronald C Biever; Nancy D Denslow; Melanie Gross; Patrick D Guiney; Henrik Holbech; Natalie K Karouna-Renier; Ioanna Katsiadaki; Hank Krueger; Steven L Levine; Gerd Maack; Mike Williams; Jeffrey C Wolf; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 3.  Leveraging existing data for prioritization of the ecological risks of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals to aquatic organisms.

Authors:  Carlie A LaLone; Jason P Berninger; Daniel L Villeneuve; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Environmental effects of anticholinesterasic therapeutic drugs on a crustacean species, Daphnia magna.

Authors:  R Rocha; F Gonçalves; C Marques; B Nunes
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Assessment of the effects of the carbamazepine on the endogenous endocrine system of Daphnia magna.

Authors:  A L Oropesa; A M Floro; P Palma
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Endocrine disruptors of sex hormone activities.

Authors:  L Varticovski; D A Stavreva; A McGowan; R Raziuddin; G L Hager
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.102

7.  Implementing ecopharmacovigilance in practice: challenges and potential opportunities.

Authors:  Gisela Holm; Jason R Snape; Richard Murray-Smith; John Talbot; David Taylor; Pernilla Sörme
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Contraceptive options and their associated estrogenic environmental loads: relationships and trade-offs.

Authors:  Usman Khan; Jim A Nicell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  From 'omics to otoliths: responses of an estuarine fish to endocrine disrupting compounds across biological scales.

Authors:  Susanne M Brander; Richard E Connon; Guochun He; James A Hobbs; Kelly L Smalling; Swee J Teh; J Wilson White; Inge Werner; Michael S Denison; Gary N Cherr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prevalent glucocorticoid and androgen activity in US water sources.

Authors:  Diana A Stavreva; Anuja A George; Paul Klausmeyer; Lyuba Varticovski; Daniel Sack; Ty C Voss; R Louis Schiltz; Vicki S Blazer; Luke R Iwanowicz; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.