| Literature DB >> 19468855 |
Rodrigo Gouvêa Taketani1, Henrique Fragoso dos Santos, Jan Dirk van Elsas, Alexandre Soares Rosado.
Abstract
An analysis of the effect of an oil spill on mangrove sediments was carried out by contamination of mesocosms derived from two different mangroves, one with a history of contamination and one pristine. The association between N(2) fixers and hydrocarbon degradation was assessed using quantitative PCR (qPCR) for the genes rrs and nifH, nifH clone library sequencing and total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) quantification using gas chromatography. TPH showed that the microbial communities of both mangroves were able to degrade the hydrocarbons added; however, whereas the majority of oil added to the mesocosm derived from the polluted mangrove was degraded in the 75 days of the experiment, there was only partially degradation in the mesocosm derived from the pristine mangrove. qPCR showed that the addition of oil led to an increase in rrs gene copy numbers in both mesocosms, having almost no effect on the nifH copy numbers in the pristine mangrove. Sequencing of nifH clones indicated that the changes promoted by the oil in the polluted mangrove were greater than those observed in the pristine mesocosm. The main effect observed in the polluted mesocosm was the selection of a single phylotype which is probably adapted to the presence of petroleum. These results, together with previous reports, give hints about the relationship between N(2) fixation and hydrocarbon degradation in natural ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19468855 PMCID: PMC2729449 DOI: 10.1007/s10482-009-9351-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek ISSN: 0003-6072 Impact factor: 2.271
Fig. 1Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantification for samples: a Pristine T0; b polluted T0; c Pristine T75; d polluted T75. Peaks indicated by arrows represent the injected standards
Fig. 2Q-PCR quantifications of rrs and nifH from total community amplifications; arrs quantification from the polluted mangrove mesocosms; brrs quantification from the pristine mangrove mesocosms; cnifH quantification from the polluted mangrove mesocosms; dnifH quantification from the pristine mangrove mesocosms. Trend line for control mesocosms are shown in black. The dotted line represents the trend line for the mesocosms with the addition of oil
Diversity and richness estimation* for nifH clone libraries
| Clones sampled | Observed OTUs | Simpson | Shannon (H′) | Chao1 | ACE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poll T0 | 18 | 15 | 0.026 | 2.630 ± 0.358 | 54 ± 28.911 | 73.270 ± 45.398 |
| Poll T75 | 20 | 2 | 0.731 | 0.422 ± 0.288 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 2.00 ± 0.00 |
| Prist T0 | 15 | 7 | 1.580 | 0.228 ± 0.228 | 17.00 ± 8.067 | 21.00 ± 11.626 |
| Prist T75 | 10 | 4 | 0.466 | 0.940 ± 0.618 | 7.00 ± 2.626 | 12.857 ± 7.866 |
Sequences were clustered on OTUs with >90% similarity
Fig. 3Richness of nifH gene types at different evolutionary distances. a Observed richness for the Polluted mesocosm; b observed richness for the Pristine mesocosm
Fig. 4Neighbor-joining tree of 86 nifH sequences. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. Branche lengths are in the units of number of base substitutions per site