| Literature DB >> 28827029 |
Janaina Rigonato1, Angela D Kent2, Thiago Gumiere3, Luiz Henrique Zanini Branco4, Fernando Dini Andreote3, Marli Fátima Fiore5.
Abstract
Variations in microbial communities promoted by alterations in environmental conditions are reflected in similarities/differences both at taxonomic and functional levels. Here we used a natural gradient within mangroves from seashore to upland, to contrast the natural variability in bacteria, cyanobacteria and diazotroph assemblages in a pristine area compared to an oil polluted area along a timespan of three years, based on ARISA (bacteria and cyanobacteria) and nifH T-RFLP (diazotrophs) fingerprinting. The data presented herein indicated that changes in all the communities evaluated were mainly driven by the temporal effect in the contaminated area, while local effects were dominant on the pristine mangrove. A positive correlation of community structure between diazotrophs and cyanobacteria was observed, suggesting the functional importance of this phylum as nitrogen fixers in mangroves soils. Different ecological patterns explained the microbial behavior in the pristine and polluted mangroves. Stochastic models in the pristine mangrove indicate that there is not a specific environmental factor that determines the bacterial distribution, while cyanobacteria and diazotrophs better fitted in deterministic model in the same area. For the contaminated mangrove site, deterministic models better represented the variations in the communities, suggesting that the presence of oil might change the microbial ecological structures over time. Mangroves represent a unique environment threatened by global change, and this study contributed to the knowledge of the microbial distribution in such areas and its response on persistent contamination historic events.Entities:
Keywords: ARISA; Cyanobacteria; Diazotrophs; Mangrove; Oil contamination; nifH T-RFLP
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28827029 PMCID: PMC5790579 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Fig. 1Location of mangroves areas in São Paulo State, and natural gradient through the transect sampled according to salinity and oil contamination in Bertioga.
Results from PERMANOVA testing the effect of location (seashore, middle of the mangrove, near the forest) and year (2007, 2008, 2009) on bacterial, cyanobacterial and diazotrophs communities composition in Cardoso Island (CI) and Bertioga (BT) mangroves.
| Effect | Df | Sums sqs | Pseudo- | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 2 | 14,968 | 6.2566 | 0.001 | 0.26 |
| Year | 2 | 10,025 | 4.1907 | 0.001 | 0.18 |
| Location vs. year | 4 | 10,070 | 2.1047 | 0.001 | 0.18 |
| Res | 18 | 21,531 | |||
| Total | 26 | 56,594 | |||
| Location | 2 | 16,234 | 7.8285 | 0.001 | 0.23 |
| Year | 2 | 19,930 | 9.6107 | 0.001 | 0.28 |
| Location vs. year | 4 | 16,716 | 4.0305 | 0.001 | 0.23 |
| Res | 18 | 18,663 | |||
| Total | 26 | 71,544 | |||
| Cyanobacteria CI | |||||
| Location | 2 | 21,969 | 1.3988 | 0.001 | 0.40 |
| Year | 2 | 10,853 | 6.9101 | 0.001 | 0.20 |
| Location vs. year | 4 | 8567.6 | 2.7276 | 0.001 | 0.15 |
| Res | 17 | 13,350 | |||
| Total | 25 | 55,347 | |||
| Location | 2 | 13,174 | 4.1962 | 0.001 | 0.18 |
| Year | 2 | 17,678 | 5.6309 | 0.001 | 0.24 |
| Location vs. year | 4 | 15,843 | 2.5233 | 0.001 | 0.21 |
| Res | 18 | 28,255 | |||
| Total | 26 | 74,950 | |||
| Location | 2 | 6185.5 | 8.281 | 0.001 | 0.19 |
| Year | 2 | 2558.8 | 3.4256 | 0.001 | 0.08 |
| Location vs. year | 4 | 2805.4 | 1.8779 | 0.001 | 0.09 |
| Res | 18 | 6722.5 | |||
| Total | 26 | 18,272 | |||
| Location | 2 | 5453.7 | 4.1667 | 0.001 | 0.17 |
| Year | 2 | 7992.4 | 6.1063 | 0.001 | 0.25 |
| Location vs. year | 4 | 6556 | 2.5044 | 0.001 | 0.21 |
| Res | 18 | 11,780 | |||
| Total | 26 | 31,782 | |||
Fig. 2Principal component analysis (PCoA) on the basis of bacterial and cyanobacterial ARISA and diazotrophs T-RFLP profile from mangrove soil collected along the transect: SS, seashore; MM, middle of the mangrove; NF, near the forest. (A) Bacteria Cardoso Island; (B) Bacteria Bertioga; (C) Cyanobacteria Cardoso Island; (D) Cyanobacteria Bertioga; (E) diazotrophs Cardoso Island; (F) diazotrophs Bertioga.
ANOSIM analysis (R value (p)) comparing the ARISA profile of bacteria and cyanobacteria and T-RFLP of diazotrophic communities of the sampling sites and time in Cardoso Island (CI) and Bertioga (BT) mangroves.
| Site | CI-bacteria | CI-cyanobacteria | CI- | BT-bacteria | BT-cyanobacteria | BT- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | ||||||
| SS × MM | 0.206 (0.009) | 0.699 (0.001) | 0.301 (0.001) | 0.398 (0.003) | 0.249 (0.026) | 0.433 (0.001) |
| SS × NF | 0.774 (0.001) | 0.878 (0.001) | 0.919 (0.001) | 0.396 (0.001) | 0.519 (0.001) | 0.436 (0.001) |
| MM × NF | 0.712 (0.001) | 0.946 (0.001) | 0.843 (0.001) | 0.025 (0.013) | 0.052 (0.22) | 0.170 (0.021) |
| 2007 × 2008 | 0.204 (0.020) | 0.134 (0.075) | 0.038 (0.219) | 0.286 (0.004) | 0.307 (0.005) | 0.27 (0.005) |
| 2007 × 2009 | 0.222 (0.015) | 0.295 (0.002) | 0.192 (0.031) | 0.768 (0.001) | 0.726 (0.001) | 0.527 (0.001) |
| 2008 × 2009 | 0.108 (0.098) | 0.263 (0.011) | 0.248 (0.004) | 0.532 (0.001) | 0.153 (0.062) | 0.141 (0.072) |
SS, seashore; MM, middle of the mangrove; NF, near the forest.
The Akaike information criterion (AIC), delta AIC (Δ) and Akaike weights (W) of species abundances distribution (SAD) models fit to bacteria, cyanobacteria and diazotroph community per mangrove.
| Models (AIC) | Δ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZSM | Broken-stick | Lognormal | ZSM | Broken-stick | Lognormal | ZSM | Broken-stick | Lognormal | |
| Cardoso Island | 471 | 794 | 658 | 0 | 324 | 188 | 100% | – | – |
| Bertioga | 647 | 778 | 561 | 86 | 217 | 0 | – | – | 100% |
| Cardoso Island | 2144 | 1314 | 905 | 1239 | 409 | 0 | – | – | 100% |
| Bertioga | 2016 | 1264 | 872 | 1144 | 392 | 0 | – | – | 100% |
| Cardoso Island | 798 | 620 | 487 | 311 | 133 | 0 | – | – | 100% |
| Bertioga | 948 | 600 | 431 | 517 | 169 | 0 | – | – | 100% |
Zero-sum multinomial – stochastic or neutral model.
Niche or deterministic model.
General model.
, where the AIC is the model tested and min AIC is the less number AIC, also considered the “best” model. Δ < 2 suggests that both models fit the observed data, values between 3 and 9 indicate that the model has considerably less support, whereas a Δ > 10 indicates no interaction of the model.
The W (Akaike weights) indicates the probability that the model accounts for all of the models tested; in other words, values <0.75 indicate a greater than 75% chance of being the best model in comparison with others.