Literature DB >> 19465456

Characterization and interlaboratory comparison of a gene expression signature for differentiating genotoxic mechanisms.

Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer1, Jennifer M Fostel, Chinami Aruga, Daniel Bauer, Eric Boitier, Shibing Deng, Donna Dickinson, Anne-Celine Le Fevre, Albert J Fornace, Olivier Grenet, Yizhong Gu, Jean-Christophe Hoflack, Masako Shiiyama, Roger Smith, Ronald D Snyder, Catherine Spire, Gotaro Tanaka, Jiri Aubrecht.   

Abstract

The genotoxicity testing battery is highly sensitive for detection of chemical carcinogens. However, it features a low specificity and provides only limited mechanistic information required for risk assessment of positive findings. This is especially important in case of positive findings in the in vitro chromosome damage assays, because chromosome damage may be also induced secondarily to cell death. An increasing body of evidence indicates that toxicogenomic analysis of cellular stress responses provides an insight into mechanisms of action of genotoxicants. To evaluate the utility of such a toxicogenomic analysis we evaluated gene expression profiles of TK6 cells treated with four model genotoxic agents using a targeted high density real-time PCR approach in a multilaboratory project coordinated by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Committee on the Application of Genomics in Mechanism-based Risk Assessment. We show that this gene profiling technology produced reproducible data across laboratories allowing us to conclude that expression analysis of a relevant gene set is capable of distinguishing compounds that cause DNA adducts or double strand breaks from those that interfere with mitotic spindle function or that cause chromosome damage as a consequence of cytotoxicity. Furthermore, our data suggest that the gene expression profiles at early time points are most likely to provide information relevant to mechanisms of genotoxic damage and that larger gene expression arrays will likely provide richer information for differentiating molecular mechanisms of action of genotoxicants. Although more compounds need to be tested to identify a robust molecular signature, this study confirms the potential of toxicogenomic analysis for investigation of genotoxic mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19465456      PMCID: PMC2734310          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  52 in total

Review 1.  A review of the genotoxicity of marketed pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  R D Snyder; J W Green
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Gene expression analysis reveals chemical-specific profiles.

Authors:  Hisham K Hamadeh; Pierre R Bushel; Supriya Jayadev; Karla Martin; Olimpia DiSorbo; Stella Sieber; Lee Bennett; Raymond Tennant; Raymond Stoll; J Carl Barrett; Kerry Blanchard; Richard S Paules; Cynthia A Afshari
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  cDNA microarray gene expression profiling of hydroxyurea, paclitaxel, and p-anisidine, genotoxic compounds with differing tumorigenicity results.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Jung Kwon; Se Nyun Kim; Ja Eun Kim; Woo Suk Koh; Eun-Joo Kim; Moon-Koo Chung; Sang-Seop Han; Chang Woo Song
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Differential responses of stress genes to low dose-rate gamma irradiation.

Authors:  Sally A Amundson; Richard Anthony Lee; Christine A Koch-Paiz; Michael L Bittner; Paul Meltzer; Jeffrey M Trent; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Genotoxicity under extreme culture conditions. A report from ICPEMC Task Group 9.

Authors:  D Scott; S M Galloway; R R Marshall; M Ishidate; D Brusick; J Ashby; B C Myhr
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Physiological function as regulation of large transcriptional programs: the cellular response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  S A Amundson; M Bittner; P Meltzer; J Trent; A J Fornace
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 7.  Functional genomics as a window on radiation stress signaling.

Authors:  Sally A Amundson; Michael Bittner; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Evaluation of the genotoxic activity of paclitaxel by the in vitro micronucleus test in combination with fluorescent in situ hybridization of a DNA centromeric probe and the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis technique (comet assay) in human T-lymphocytes.

Authors:  L Digue; T Orsière; M De Méo; M G Mattéi; D Depetris; F Duffaud; R Favre; A Botta
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  ATF3 induction following DNA damage is regulated by distinct signaling pathways and over-expression of ATF3 protein suppresses cells growth.

Authors:  Feiyue Fan; Shunqian Jin; Sally A Amundson; Tong Tong; Wenhong Fan; Hongcheng Zhao; Xiaocheng Zhu; Lucia Mazzacurati; Xianxing Li; Kimberly L Petrik; Albert J Fornace; Baskaran Rajasekaran; Qimin Zhan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 10.  APE/Ref-1 and the mammalian response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Gerhard Fritz; Sabine Grösch; Maja Tomicic; Bernd Kaina
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.221

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of bioinformatics in toxicology: advancing toxicogenomics.

Authors:  Cynthia A Afshari; Hisham K Hamadeh; Pierre R Bushel
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Development of a toxicogenomics signature for genotoxicity using a dose-optimization and informatics strategy in human cells.

Authors:  Heng-Hong Li; Daniel R Hyduke; Renxiang Chen; Pamela Heard; Carole L Yauk; Jiri Aubrecht; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 3.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Authors:  Brinda Mahadevan; Ronald D Snyder; Michael D Waters; R Daniel Benz; Raymond A Kemper; Raymond R Tice; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Selectively targeting the DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor as a prospective therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kush Dalal; Mani Roshan-Moniri; Aishwariya Sharma; Huifang Li; Fuqiang Ban; Mohamed Hessein; Michael Hsing; Kriti Singh; Eric LeBlanc; Scott Dehm; Emma S Tomlinson Guns; Artem Cherkasov; Paul S Rennie
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Identification of Stage-Specific Gene Expression Signatures in Response to Retinoic Acid during the Neural Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Hiromi Akanuma; Xian-Yang Qin; Reiko Nagano; Tin-Tin Win-Shwe; Satoshi Imanishi; Hiroko Zaha; Jun Yoshinaga; Tomokazu Fukuda; Seiichiroh Ohsako; Hideko Sone
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Hepatic mRNA, microRNA, and miR-34a-target responses in mice after 28 days exposure to doses of benzo(a)pyrene that elicit DNA damage and mutation.

Authors:  Amal I Malik; Andrew Williams; Christine L Lemieux; Paul A White; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 7.  The Salmonella mutagenicity assay: the stethoscope of genetic toxicology for the 21st century.

Authors:  Larry D Claxton; Gisela de A Umbuzeiro; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Human embryonic stem cell derived hepatocyte-like cells as a tool for in vitro hazard assessment of chemical carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Reha Yildirimman; Gabriella Brolén; Mireia Vilardell; Gustav Eriksson; Jane Synnergren; Hans Gmuender; Atanas Kamburov; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; José Castell; Agustin Lahoz; Jos Kleinjans; Joost van Delft; Petter Björquist; Ralf Herwig
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Discovery of novel antagonists targeting the DNA binding domain of androgen receptor by integrated docking-based virtual screening and bioassays.

Authors:  Jin-Ping Pang; Chao Shen; Wen-Fang Zhou; Yun-Xia Wang; Lu-Hu Shan; Xin Chai; Ying Shao; Xue-Ping Hu; Feng Zhu; Dan-Yan Zhu; Li Xiao; Lei Xu; Xiao-Hong Xu; Dan Li; Ting-Jun Hou
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 7.169

10.  A metabolomics investigation of non-genotoxic carcinogenicity in the rat.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Ament; Claire L Waterman; James A West; Catherine Waterfield; Richard A Currie; Jayne Wright; Julian L Griffin
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.