Literature DB >> 19462190

A comparison of stress tolerance in YPD and industrial lignocellulose-based medium among industrial and laboratory yeast strains.

Eva Albers1, Christer Larsson.   

Abstract

In general, it is believed that fermentation by yeast under harsh industrial conditions, especially if substrates such as wood hydrolysate or lignocellulosic substrates are used, requires the use of so-called industrial strains. In order to check whether this is always true, a comparison of performance was made using two industrial strains and four commonly used laboratory strains, the haploid and diploid versions of CEN-PK and X2180, under industrially relevant stress conditions. The industrial strains were a Swedish commercial baker's yeast strain and a strain previously isolated from an industrial bioethanol production plant using lignocellulosic substrate. Stress conditions included, apart from growth in the lignocellulosic substrate itself, elevated concentrations of glucose, NaCl, ethanol, and lactate as well as low pH. Results showed that, indeed, the strain adapted to lignocellulosic substrate also possessed the highest growth rate as well as shortest duration of the lag phase in this type of medium. However, the higher the additional stress level, the lower the difference compared to other strains, and X2180 in particular displayed a high resistance to these additional stress conditions. Furthermore, no difference in performance could be detected between the haploid or diploid versions of the laboratory strains. It might be that, at least under some circumstances, a laboratory strain such as X2180 could be an industrially attractive production organism with the advantage of facilitating the possibilities for making controlled genetic manipulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19462190     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-009-0592-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  13 in total

1.  Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks.

Authors:  Anders Wingren; Mats Galbe; Guido Zacchi
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials.

Authors:  Arthur J Ragauskas; Charlotte K Williams; Brian H Davison; George Britovsek; John Cairney; Charles A Eckert; William J Frederick; Jason P Hallett; David J Leak; Charles L Liotta; Jonathan R Mielenz; Richard Murphy; Richard Templer; Timothy Tschaplinski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Bio-ethanol--the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today.

Authors:  B Hahn-Hägerdal; M Galbe; M F Gorwa-Grauslund; G Lidén; G Zacchi
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Automated screening in environmental arrays allows analysis of quantitative phenotypic profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jonas Warringer; Anders Blomberg
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 5.  Modification of biochemical pathways in industrial yeasts.

Authors:  J Hansen; M C Kielland-Brandt
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1996-08-20       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 6.  Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status.

Authors:  Antonius J A van Maris; Derek A Abbott; Eleonora Bellissimi; Joost van den Brink; Marko Kuyper; Marijke A H Luttik; H Wouter Wisselink; W Alexander Scheffers; Johannes P van Dijken; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  The fermentation performance of nine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and fed-batch cultures in dilute-acid wood hydrolysate.

Authors:  Tomas Brandberg; Carl Johan Franzén; Lena Gustafsson
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Water stress plating hypersensitivity of yeasts.

Authors:  K F Mackenzie; A Blomberg; A D Brown
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1986-07

Review 10.  Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling.

Authors:  Brian R Gibson; Stephen J Lawrence; Jessica P R Leclaire; Chris D Powell; Katherine A Smart
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 16.408

View more
  14 in total

1.  Biotechnological properties of distillery and laboratory yeasts in response to industrial stresses.

Authors:  Fernanda Bravim; Fernando L Palhano; A Alberto R Fernandes; Patricia M B Fernandes
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Heterologous secretory expression of β-glucosidase from Thermoascus aurantiacus in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Izat Smekenov; Marzhan Bakhtambayeva; Kudaybergen Bissenbayev; Murat Saparbayev; Sabira Taipakova; Amangeldy K Bissenbaev
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.476

3.  Improving freeze-tolerance of baker's yeast through seamless gene deletion of NTH1 and PUT1.

Authors:  Jian Dong; Didi Chen; Guanglu Wang; Cuiying Zhang; Liping Du; Shanshan Liu; Yu Zhao; Dongguang Xiao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Toward Methanol-Based Biomanufacturing: Emerging Strategies for Engineering Synthetic Methylotrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Philip A Kelso; Louise K M Chow; Alex C Carpenter; Ian T Paulsen; Thomas C Williams
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 5.  Review of Second Generation Bioethanol Production from Residual Biomass.

Authors:  Katarzyna Robak; Maria Balcerek
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.918

6.  Unravelling evolutionary strategies of yeast for improving galactose utilization through integrated systems level analysis.

Authors:  Kuk-Ki Hong; Wanwipa Vongsangnak; Goutham N Vemuri; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Selective suppression of bacterial contaminants by process conditions during lignocellulose based yeast fermentations.

Authors:  Eva Albers; Emma Johansson; Carl Johan Franzén; Christer Larsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Identification of candidate genes for yeast engineering to improve bioethanol production in very high gravity and lignocellulosic biomass industrial fermentations.

Authors:  Francisco B Pereira; Pedro Mr Guimarães; Daniel G Gomes; Nuno P Mira; Miguel C Teixeira; Isabel Sá-Correia; Lucília Domingues
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Comparative polygenic analysis of maximal ethanol accumulation capacity and tolerance to high ethanol levels of cell proliferation in yeast.

Authors:  Thiago M Pais; María R Foulquié-Moreno; Georg Hubmann; Jorge Duitama; Steve Swinnen; Annelies Goovaerts; Yudi Yang; Françoise Dumortier; Johan M Thevelein
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Generation of diploid Pichia pastoris strains by mating and their application for recombinant protein production.

Authors:  Ming-Tang Chen; Song Lin; Ishaan Shandil; Dewan Andrews; Terrance A Stadheim; Byung-Kwon Choi
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.