Literature DB >> 19458785

Evaluation of Reproducibility for Paired Functional Data.

Runze Li1, Mosuk Chow.   

Abstract

Evaluation of reproducibility is important in assessing whether a new method or instrument can reproduce the results from a traditional gold standard approach. In this paper, we propose a measure to assess measurement agreement for functional data which are frequently encountered in medical research and many other research fields. Formulae to compute the standard error of the proposed estimator and confidence intervals for the proposed measure are derived. The estimators and the coverage probabilities of the confidence intervals are empirically tested for small to moderate sample sizes via Monte Carlo simulations. A real data example in physiology study is used to illustrate the proposed statistical inference procedures.

Year:  2005        PMID: 19458785      PMCID: PMC2674768          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2004.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Multivar Anal        ISSN: 0047-259X            Impact factor:   1.473


  9 in total

1.  Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  E F Vonesh; V M Chinchilli; K Pu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Robust estimators of the concordance correlation coefficient.

Authors:  T S King; V M Chinchilli
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Modeling concordance correlation via GEE to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  H X Barnhart; J M Williamson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data.

Authors:  T S King; V M Chinchilli
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  A weighted concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measurement designs.

Authors:  V M Chinchilli; J K Martel; S Kumanyika; T Lloyd
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with random effects models.

Authors:  H Quan; W J Shih
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable.

Authors:  J Lee; D Koh; C N Ong
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.589

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Concordance of MEG and fMRI patterns in adolescents during verb generation.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Scott K Holland; Jennifer Vannest
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  The accuracy of a near-infrared spectroscopy cerebral oximetry device and its potential value for estimating jugular venous oxygen saturation.

Authors:  Keita Ikeda; David B MacLeod; Hilary P Grocott; Eugene W Moretti; Warwick Ames; Charles Vacchiano
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Statistical methods for evaluating the correlation between timeline follow-back data and daily process data with applications to research on alcohol and marijuana use.

Authors:  Wanjun Liu; Runze Li; Marc A Zimmerman; Maureen A Walton; Rebecca M Cunningham; Anne Buu
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  A methodological framework for assessing agreement between cost-effectiveness outcomes estimated using alternative sources of data on treatment costs and effects for trial-based economic evaluations.

Authors:  Felix Achana; Stavros Petrou; Kamran Khan; Amadou Gaye; Neena Modi
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-02-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.