Literature DB >> 11550947

Modeling concordance correlation via GEE to evaluate reproducibility.

H X Barnhart1, J M Williamson.   

Abstract

Clinical studies are often concerned with assessing whether different raters/methods produce similar values for measuring a quantitative variable. Use of the concordance correlation coefficient as a measure of reproducibility has gained popularity in practice since its introduction by Lin (1989, Biometrics 45, 255-268). Lin's method is applicable for studies evaluating two raters/two methods without replications. Chinchilli et al. (1996, Biometrics 52, 341-353) extended Lin's approach to repeated measures designs by using a weighted concordance correlation coefficient. However, the existing methods cannot easily accommodate covariate adjustment, especially when one needs to model agreement. In this article, we propose a generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach to model the concordance correlation coefficient via three sets of estimating equations. The proposed approach is flexible in that (1) it can accommodate more than two correlated readings and test for the equality of dependent concordant correlation estimates; (2) it can incorporate covariates predictive of the marginal distribution; (3) it can be used to identify covariates predictive of concordance correlation; and (4) it requires minimal distribution assumptions. A simulation study is conducted to evaluate the asymptotic properties of the proposed approach. The method is illustrated with data from two biomedical studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11550947     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00931.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings.

Authors:  Huiman X Barnhart; Jingli Song; Michael J Haber
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Modeling the agreement of discrete bivariate survival times using kappa coefficient.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Amita K Manatunga
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Evaluation of Reproducibility for Paired Functional Data.

Authors:  Runze Li; Mosuk Chow
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.473

4.  One-year test-retest reliability of a Japanese web-based version of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for major depression in a working population.

Authors:  Haruki Shimoda; Akiomi Inoue; Kanami Tsuno; Norito Kawakami
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Evaluation of Agreement between Measurement Methods from Data with Matched Repeated Measurements via the Coefficient of Individual Agreement.

Authors:  Michael Haber; Jingjing Gao; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  J Data Sci       Date:  2010-07-01

6.  lcc: an R package to estimate the concordance correlation, Pearson correlation and accuracy over time.

Authors:  Thiago P Oliveira; Rafael A Moral; Silvio S Zocchi; Clarice G B Demetrio; John Hinde
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Estimation of coefficients of individual agreement (CIAs) for quantitative and binary data using SAS and R.

Authors:  Yi Pan; Jingjing Gao; Michael Haber; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Anthony P Reeves; Erich P Huang; Xiao-Feng Wang; Andrew J Buckler; Hyun J Grace Kim; Huiman X Barnhart; Edward F Jackson; Maryellen L Giger; Gene Pennello; Alicia Y Toledano; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Tatiyana V Apanasovich; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle J Myers; Dmitry B Goldgof; Daniel P Barboriak; Robert J Gillies; Lawrence H Schwartz; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Maximum likelihood estimation of reviewers' acumen in central review setting: categorical data.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; James M Boyett; Mehmet Kocak; David W Ellison; Yanan Wu
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.432

10.  A robust permutation test for the concordance correlation coefficient.

Authors:  Alan D Hutson; Han Yu
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.894

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.