BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a valid biomarker of semen exposure in women and has been used to assess reliability of self-reported sexual behavior as well as serve as a proxy measure for condom efficacy. Quantitative PSA tests are expensive and require specialized equipment. A simple, rapid, and inexpensive test for PSA would facilitate semen biomarker evaluation in a variety of research settings. This study evaluated the performance of a rapid PSA test compared with a quantitative assay to identify semen in vaginal swab specimens. METHODS: We tested 581 vaginal swabs collected from 492 women participating in 2 separate research studies in Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. PSA in vaginal secretions was detected using the quantitative IMx (Abbott Laboratories) assay and the ABAcard p30 (Abacus Diagnostics) rapid immunochromatographic strip test. RESULTS: The ABAcard test was 100% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 98%-100%) and 96% specific (95% CI, 93%-97%) compared with the quantitative test in detecting >1.0 ng PSA/mL vaginal swab eluate. Rapid PSA results were semiquantitative and correlated well with PSA concentrations (kappa = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.90). CONCLUSION: Rapid PSA detection requires no instrumentation and can be performed easily and economically. Having rapid PSA results available immediately following interview provides opportunities to explore discrepancies between the objective marker of recent semen exposure and self-reported behaviors.
BACKGROUND:Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a valid biomarker of semen exposure in women and has been used to assess reliability of self-reported sexual behavior as well as serve as a proxy measure for condom efficacy. Quantitative PSA tests are expensive and require specialized equipment. A simple, rapid, and inexpensive test for PSA would facilitate semen biomarker evaluation in a variety of research settings. This study evaluated the performance of a rapid PSA test compared with a quantitative assay to identify semen in vaginal swab specimens. METHODS: We tested 581 vaginal swabs collected from 492 women participating in 2 separate research studies in Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. PSA in vaginal secretions was detected using the quantitative IMx (Abbott Laboratories) assay and the ABAcardp30 (Abacus Diagnostics) rapid immunochromatographic strip test. RESULTS: The ABAcard test was 100% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 98%-100%) and 96% specific (95% CI, 93%-97%) compared with the quantitative test in detecting >1.0 ng PSA/mL vaginal swab eluate. Rapid PSA results were semiquantitative and correlated well with PSA concentrations (kappa = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.90). CONCLUSION: Rapid PSA detection requires no instrumentation and can be performed easily and economically. Having rapid PSA results available immediately following interview provides opportunities to explore discrepancies between the objective marker of recent semen exposure and self-reported behaviors.
Authors: M F Gallo; F M Behets; M J Steiner; S C Thomsen; W Ombidi; S Luchters; C Toroitich-Ruto; M M Hobbs Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: J M Zenilman; C S Weisman; A M Rompalo; N Ellish; D M Upchurch; E W Hook; D Celentano Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 1995 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Maurizio Macaluso; M Louise Lawson; Glen Hortin; Ann Duerr; Karen R Hammond; Richard Blackwell; Amy Bloom Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Maurizio Macaluso; Richard Blackwell; Denise J Jamieson; Andrzej Kulczycki; Michael P Chen; Rachel Akers; Dhong-jin Kim; Ann Duerr Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-04-09 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Nancy S Padian; Ariane van der Straten; Gita Ramjee; Tsungai Chipato; Guy de Bruyn; Kelly Blanchard; Stephen Shiboski; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Heidi Fancher; Helen Cheng; Michael Rosenblum; Mark van der Laan; Nicholas Jewell; James McIntyre Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael P Chen; Maurizio Macaluso; Richard Blackwell; Loren Galvao; Andrzej Kulczycki; Juan Diaz; Denise J Jamieson; Ann Duerr Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Maria F Gallo; Lee Warner; Marcia M Hobbs; Denise J Jamieson; Tina Hylton-Kong; Markus J Steiner Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Darcy White; Kate S Wilson; Linnet N Masese; George Wanje; Walter Jaoko; Kishorchandra Mandaliya; Barbra A Richardson; John Kinuthia; Jane M Simoni; R Scott McClelland Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Clive Anderson; Maria F Gallo; Tina Hylton-Kong; Markus J Steiner; Marcia M Hobbs; Maurizio Macaluso; J Peter Figueroa; Denise J Jamieson; Jennifer Legardy-Williams; Jeffrey Wiener; Lee Warner Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Maria F Gallo; Markus J Steiner; Marcia M Hobbs; Lee Warner; Denise J Jamieson; Maurizio Macaluso Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Margaret C Snead; Athena P Kourtis; Carolyn M Black; Christine K Mauck; Teresa M Brown; Ana Penman-Aguilar; Johan H Melendez; Maria F Gallo; Denise J Jamieson; Maurizio Macaluso Journal: Contraception Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Margaret C Snead; Athena P Kourtis; Johan H Melendez; Carolyn M Black; Christine K Mauck; Ana Penman-Aguilar; Dorothy M Chaney; Maria F Gallo; Denise J Jamieson; Maurizio Macaluso; Gustavo F Doncel Journal: Contraception Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 3.375