Literature DB >> 23677018

Biological markers of sexual activity: tools for improving measurement in HIV/sexually transmitted infection prevention research.

Maria F Gallo1, Markus J Steiner, Marcia M Hobbs, Lee Warner, Denise J Jamieson, Maurizio Macaluso.   

Abstract

Research on interventions to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is heavily influenced by participant reporting of sexual behavior, despite uncertainty about its validity. Exclusive reliance on participant self-report often is based, overtly or by implication, on 4 assumptions: (1) no feasible alternatives exist; (2) misreporting can be minimized to levels that can be disregarded; (3) misreporting tends to underreport sensitive behaviors; and (4) misreporting tends to be nondifferential with respect to the groups being compared. The objective of this review are to evaluate these assumptions, including a review of studies using semen biomarkers to evaluate the validity of self-reported data, and to make recommendations for applying biological markers of semen exposure detectable in women to further strengthen research on HIV/STI prevention. Increasing evidence shows that semen biomarkers provide an important means of assessing and augmenting the validity of studies on HIV/STI prevention. Additional biomarkers are needed to assess male exposure to vaginal sex and both male and female exposure to anal sex. Methods and study designs that incorporate biomarkers into studies collecting self-reported behavioral data should be considered where possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23677018      PMCID: PMC3812692          DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31828b2f77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  34 in total

1.  NIMH/APPC workgroup on behavioral and biological outcomes in HIV/STD prevention studies: a position statement.

Authors:  W Pequegnat; M Fishbein; D Celentano; A Ehrhardt; G Garnett; D Holtgrave; J Jaccard; J Schachter; J Zenilman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  The use of prostate-specific antigen as a criterion for condom effectiveness.

Authors:  Milan Zaviacic; Richard J Ablin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire?

Authors:  Alan R Kristal; Ulrike Peters; John D Potter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  How to improve the validity of sexual behaviour reporting: systematic review of questionnaire delivery modes in developing countries.

Authors:  Lisa F Langhaug; Lorraine Sherr; Frances M Cowan
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Randomised controlled trial on whether advance knowledge of prostate-specific antigen testing improves participant reporting of unprotected sex.

Authors:  Sarah C Thomsen; Maria F Gallo; Wilkister Ombidi; Zablon Omungo; Barbara Janowitz; Mark Hawken; Heidi Tucker; Emelita L Wong; Marcia M Hobbs
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Effectiveness of female and male condoms in preventing exposure to semen during vaginal intercourse: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Loren W Galvão; Laurione C Oliveira; Juan Díaz; Dhong-Jin Kim; Nádia Marchi; Johannes van Dam; Roger F Castilho; Michael Chen; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Prostate-specific antigen to ascertain reliability of self-reported coital exposure to semen.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; Frieda M Behets; Markus J Steiner; Marcia M Hobbs; Theresa Hatzell Hoke; Kathleen Van Damme; Louisette Ralimamonjy; Leonardine Raharimalala; Myron S Cohen
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of counseling messages for avoiding unprotected sexual intercourse during sexually transmitted infection and reproductive tract infection treatment among female sexually transmitted infection clinic patients.

Authors:  Clive Anderson; Maria F Gallo; Tina Hylton-Kong; Markus J Steiner; Marcia M Hobbs; Maurizio Macaluso; J Peter Figueroa; Denise J Jamieson; Jennifer Legardy-Williams; Jeffrey Wiener; Lee Warner
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  The validity of teens' and young adults' self-reported condom use.

Authors:  Eve Rose; Ralph J Diclemente; Gina M Wingood; Jessica McDermott Sales; Teaniese P Latham; Richard A Crosby; Jonathan Zenilman; Johan Melendez; James Hardin
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2009-01

10.  Biomarker validation of reports of recent sexual activity: results of a randomized controlled study in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Alexandra M Minnis; Markus J Steiner; Maria F Gallo; Lee Warner; Marcia M Hobbs; Ariane van der Straten; Tsungai Chipato; Maurizio Macaluso; Nancy S Padian
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  34 in total

1.  Differences in misreporting of sexual behavior over time: implications for HIV trials.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; Lee Warner; Marcia M Hobbs; Denise J Jamieson; Tina Hylton-Kong; Markus J Steiner
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  The use of biomarkers of semen exposure in sexual and reproductive health studies.

Authors:  Margaret Christine Snead; Carolyn M Black; Athena P Kourtis
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Assessing the Reliability of Self-Reported Sexual Behavior Among Male Couples.

Authors:  Alison R Walsh; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-02-09

4.  Biomarker validation of self-reported sex among middle-aged female sex workers in China.

Authors:  Jennifer Guida; Ami Fukunaga; Hongjie Liu
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Using biomarkers to assess the validity of sexual behavior reporting across interview modes among young women in Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Christine A Kelly; Paul C Hewett; Barbara S Mensch; Johanna C Rankin; Samuel L Nsobya; Samuel Kalibala; Pamela N Kakande
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2014-03

6.  Are hormonal contraceptive users more likely to misreport unprotected sex? Evidence from a biomarker validation study in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Sandra I McCoy; Lauren J Ralph; Nancy S Padian; Alexandra M Minnis
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-12

7.  Y Chromosome DNA in Women's Vaginal Samples as a Biomarker of Recent Vaginal Sex and Condom Use With Male Partners in the HPV Infection and Transmission Among Couples Through Heterosexual Activity Cohort Study.

Authors:  Talía Malagón; Ann Burchell; Mariam El-Zein; Julie Guénoun; Pierre-Paul Tellier; François Coutlée; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Sources of racial disparities in HIV prevalence in men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA, USA: a modelling study.

Authors:  Steven M Goodreau; Eli S Rosenberg; Samuel M Jenness; Nicole Luisi; Sarah E Stansfield; Gregorio A Millett; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 12.767

Review 9.  The validity of self-reported behaviors: methods for estimating underreporting of risk behaviors.

Authors:  Marlena S Norwood; James P Hughes; K Rivet Amico
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  How often do condoms fail? A cross-sectional study exploring incomplete use of condoms, condom failures and other condom problems among black and white MSM in southern U.S.A.

Authors:  Alfonso C Hernández-Romieu; Aaron J Siegler; Patrick S Sullivan; Richard Crosby; Eli S Rosenberg
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.