Literature DB >> 19452440

Anatomic imaging of abdominal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: seeing is believing with magnetic resonance imaging angiography.

David Greenspun1, Julie Vasile, Joshua L Levine, Heather Erhard, Rebecca Studinger, Victoria Chernyak, Tiffany Newman, Martin Prince, Robert J Allen.   

Abstract

The tremendous variability of the inferior epigastric arterial system makes accurate imaging of the vasculature of the anterior abdominal wall an essential component of optimal perforator selection. Preoperative imaging of the abdominal vasculature allows for preoperative perforator selection, resulting in improved operative efficiency and flap design. Abdominal wall perforators of 1-mm diameter can be reliably visualized without exposing patients to ionizing radiation or iodinated intravenous contrast through advances in magnetic resonance imaging angiography (MRA). In this study, MRA imaging was performed on 31 patients who underwent 50 abdominal flaps. For each flap, the location, relative to the umbilicus, of the three largest perforators on both the left and right sides of the abdomen was determined with MRA. Vessel diameter and anatomic course were also evaluated. Postoperatively, a survey was completed by the surgeon to assess the accuracy of the MRA with respect to the intraoperative findings. All perforators visualized on MRA were found at surgery (0% false-positive). In 2 of 50 flaps, the surgeon transferred a flap based upon a vessel not visualized on the MRA (4% false-negative). This article details our experience with MRA as a reliable preoperative imaging technique for abdominal perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19452440     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1220862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  8 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for planning autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

2.  Planning deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a comparison between multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  A Cina; L Barone-Adesi; P Rinaldi; A Cipriani; M Salgarello; R Masetti; L Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Optimising the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel Casares Santiago; Emilio García-Tutor; Gil Rodríguez Caravaca; Julián Del Cerro González; Léa Marie Klein; Alberto Alonso-Burgos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paige L Myers; Jonas A Nelson; Robert J Allen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  Preoperative identification of a perforator using computed tomography angiography and metal clip marking in perforator flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Jung Woo Lee; Han Kyeol Kim; Sin Rak Kim; Yea Sik Han; Jin Hyung Park
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 6.  Advances in imaging technologies for planning breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Anita T Mohan; Michel Saint-Cyr
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance angiography in perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Julie V Vasile; Joshua L Levine
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

8.  Intraoperative laser angiography using the SPY system: review of the literature and recommendations for use.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Gurtner; Glyn E Jones; Peter C Neligan; Martin I Newman; Brett T Phillips; Justin M Sacks; Michael R Zenn
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2013-01-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.