Literature DB >> 24871336

Optimising the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction.

Miguel Casares Santiago1, Emilio García-Tutor, Gil Rodríguez Caravaca, Julián Del Cerro González, Léa Marie Klein, Alberto Alonso-Burgos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps has become increasingly important in radiology services as multidetector CT angiography (CTA) has been proven to be the technique of choice. We aim to optimise the process, checking the value of the "Navarra criteria," assessing radiological and surgical concordance.
METHODS: Preoperative CTA was obtained in 105 DIEP flaps involving 101 women (mean age 49.1 years). A main perforator pedicle and an alternative were chosen, applying a modification of the "Navarra criteria," assessing the correlation between the main perforator chosen by the radiologist and the one that was ultimately used to perform the flap using the Kappa index.
RESULTS: In 100 of the 105 DIEP flaps (95.2%), the perforator pedicles chosen were ultimately used to raise the flap. Four of the perforator pedicles that were not used were dismissed due to avoidable errors in the radiological approach. Concordance was very high, with a Kappa index of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99). CT room time was less than 12 minutes, and reading time was 10 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of the "Navarra criteria" in preoperative planning of DIEP flaps improves radiological and surgical concordance as well as the reading process. KEY POINTS: DIEP flap is one of the best techniques for breast reconstruction. Preoperative planning is essential in DIEP flaps. CTA is the best option for the preoperative planning of DIEP flaps. "Navarra criteria" allow radiologists to choose the best perforator to form flaps. Modified "Navarra criteria" improves radiological and surgical concordance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24871336     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3243-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  24 in total

1.  Raising perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: the intramuscular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery.

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Mark W Ashton; Wei R Pan; G Ian Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  3D CT angiography of abdominal wall vascular perforators to plan DIEAP flaps.

Authors:  Gedge D Rosson; Christopher G Williams; Elliot K Fishman; Navin K Singh
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.425

Review 3.  Reviewing the vascular supply of the anterior abdominal wall: redefining anatomy for increasingly refined surgery.

Authors:  W M Rozen; M W Ashton; G I Taylor
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Advances in the pre-operative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Damien L Stella; James Bowden; G Ian Taylor; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.425

5.  A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.

Authors:  A Khoo; S S Kroll; G P Reece; M J Miller; G R Evans; G L Robb; B J Baldwin; B G Wang; M A Schusterman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Planning deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a comparison between multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  A Cina; L Barone-Adesi; P Rinaldi; A Cipriani; M Salgarello; R Masetti; L Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Breast reconstruction using perforator flaps.

Authors:  Jay W Granzow; Joshua L Levine; Ernest S Chiu; Robert J Allen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Multidetector-row computed tomography in the planning of abdominal perforator flaps.

Authors:  J Masia; J A Clavero; J R Larrañaga; X Alomar; G Pons; P Serret
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.

Authors:  Patrick B Garvey; Edward W Buchel; Barbara A Pockaj; William J Casey; Richard J Gray; José L Hernández; Thomas D Samson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Karen Veltri; Dana Khuthaila; Gloria Rockwell; Eric Duku
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preoperative computed tomography angiography for planning DIEP flap breast reconstruction reduces operative time and overall complications.

Authors:  Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor; Warren Matthew Rozen; Muhammad Chowdhry; Bassam Band; Venkat V Ramakrishnan; Matthew Griffiths
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

2.  Concordance between preoperative computed tomography angiographic mapping and intraoperative perforator selection for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Vivian B Boer; Jan J van Wingerden; Carolien F Wever; Joost J Kardux; Michiel R Beets; Hester J van der Zaag-Loonen; Willem J Theuvenet
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

3.  DIEP Flap Preoperative Planning Using Virtual Reality Based on CT Angiography.

Authors:  Dana Egozi; Vladimir Perkhulov; Liza Kouniavsky; Anais Di Via Loschope; Michal Benkler; David Benharush
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 4.  Vascular CT and MRI: a practical guide to imaging protocols.

Authors:  D J Murphy; A Aghayev; M L Steigner
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-03-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.