Literature DB >> 19451383

Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: effects on monitoring and control.

Matthew G Rhodes1, Alan D Castel.   

Abstract

Prior work has demonstrated that the perceptual features of visually presented stimuli can have a strong influence on predictions of memory performance, even when those features are unrelated to recall (Rhodes & Castel, 2008). The present study examined whether this finding would hold in an auditory domain and influence study-choice allocation. Participants listened to words that varied in volume, made judgments of learning (JOLs) for each item, and were then administered a test of free recall. In Experiment 1, we showed that JOLs were influenced by volume, with loud words given higher JOLs than quiet words, and that volume had no influence on recall, illustrating a metacognitive illusion based on auditory information. In Experiment 2, we extended these findings to control processes and showed that participants were more likely to choose to restudy quiet words than loud words. These findings indicate that highly accessible auditory information is integrated into JOLs and restudy choices, even when this information does not influence actual memory performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19451383     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory.

Authors:  T A Busey; J Tunnicliff; G R Loftus; E F Loftus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.

Authors:  Christopher Hertzog; John Dunlosky; A Emanuel Robinson; Daniel P Kidder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Hilit Ma'ayan; Ravit Nussinson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-02

5.  Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Bridgid Finn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

6.  Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition.

Authors:  Asher Koriat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

7.  Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.

Authors:  L K Son; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.

Authors:  A S Benjamin; R A Bjork; B L Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-03

10.  Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.

Authors:  Matthew G Rhodes; Alan D Castel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11
View more
  20 in total

1.  Are we aware of our ability to forget? Metacognitive predictions of directed forgetting.

Authors:  Michael C Friedman; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

2.  Not all perceptual difficulties lower memory predictions: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with rotated and inverted object images.

Authors:  Miri Besken; Elif Cemre Solmaz; Meltem Karaca; Nilsu Atılgan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

3.  Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.

Authors:  Zehra F Peynircioğlu; Joshua R Tatz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

4.  Would disfluency by any other name still be disfluent? Examining the disfluency effect with cursive handwriting.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Mary L Still; Veronica J Dark; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

5.  The effects of list composition and perceptual fluency on judgments of learning (JOLs).

Authors:  Jonathan A Susser; Neil W Mulligan; Miri Besken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10

6.  The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

7.  The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.

Authors:  Chunliang Yang; Bukuan Sun; David R Shanks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-04

8.  A metacognitive illusion in monkeys.

Authors:  Stephen Ferrigno; Nate Kornell; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Performance bias: Why judgments of learning are not affected by learning.

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Hannah Hausman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

10.  Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: the use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgments of learning.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Matthew G Rhodes; Michael C Friedman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.