| Literature DB >> 19451125 |
Tamara N Romanuk1, Yun Zhou, Ulrich Brose, Eric L Berlow, Richard J Williams, Neo D Martinez.
Abstract
A central and perhaps insurmountable challenge of invasion ecology is to predict which combinations of species and habitats most effectively promote and prevent biological invasions. Here, we integrate models of network structure and nonlinear population dynamics to search for potential generalities among trophic factors that may drive invasion success and failure. We simulate invasions where 100 different species attempt to invade 150 different food webs with 15-26 species and a wide range (0.06-0.32) of connectance. These simulations yield 11 438 invasion attempts by non-basal species, 47 per cent of which are successful. At the time of introduction, whether or not the invader is a generalist best predicts final invasion success; however, once the invader establishes itself, it is best distinguished from unsuccessful invaders by occupying a lower trophic position and being relatively invulnerable to predation. In general, variables that reflect the interaction between an invading species and its new community, such as generality and trophic position, best predict invasion success; however, for some trophic categories of invaders, fundamental species traits, such as having the centre of the feeding range low on the theoretical niche axis (for non-omnivorous and omnivorous herbivores), or the topology of the food web (for tertiary carnivores), best predict invasion success. Across all invasion scenarios, a discriminant analysis model predicted successful and failed invasions with 76.5 per cent accuracy for properties at the time of introduction or 100 per cent accuracy for properties at the time of establishment. More generally, our results suggest that tackling the challenge of predicting the properties of species and habitats that promote or inhibit invasions from food web perspective may aid ecologists in identifying rules that govern invasions in natural ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19451125 PMCID: PMC2685429 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8436 Impact factor: 6.237
Figure 1Diagram of the niche model and the invasion sequence. (a) S (trophic species richness) and C (connectance) are set at the desired values. Each of S species (here S=7, shown by inverted triangles) is assigned a ‘niche value’ (n) drawn uniformly from the interval (0, 1). Species i consumes all species falling in a range (r) that is placed by uniformly drawing the centre of the range (c) from the interval (r/2, n). Thus, in this diagram, species i consumes four species (grey and black triangles) including itself. The size of r is assigned by using a beta function to randomly draw values from the interval (0, 1) whose expected value is 2C and then multiplying that value by n to obtain a web with C that matches the desired C. These rules stochastically assign each invader three fundamental niche values (n, r, c). These values determine the invader's fundamental niche and, in concert with the fundamental niches of species in the invaded web, determine the realized niche of the invader. Thus, for example, an invader i with a specific r and c has higher generality in an invaded web when relatively many species' n fit within i's feeding range than when invading a web with relatively few species' n fitting within i's r. (b) Example of attempted invasions by two different invaders into the same web. Invader 1 cannot invade because no species fall within its feeding range. Invader 2 can invade as it has prey (five grey triangles and itself) and therefore is allowed.
Figure 2Invasion success. (a) Fraction of the total number of successful invasions across all C categories (black bars, all C) and in C=0.05 (white bars), 0.15 (light grey bars) and 0.30 (dark grey bars) webs. (b) Fraction of successful invasions according to trophic category across all C categories (black bars, all C) and in C=0.05 (white bars), 0.15 (light grey bars) and 0.30 (dark grey bars) webs. Trophic categories are defined according to the SCL and TL of the invader: herbivore (SCL=1, TL<2), herbivorous omnivore (SCL=1, TL>2), secondary consumer (SCL=2) and tertiary consumer (SCL=3). Fractions of successful and failed invasions are shown for C=0.05, 0.15 and 0.3.
DA by C at t=2000 among all simulations combined (all) as well as within each C category separately for web properties and fundamental and realized-niche properties of the invader for predicting invasion success showing effect size (F), p-value (p) and the standardized function coefficients (coeff.). (Blank spaces indicate that the variable was not selected in forward stepwise DA. Positive coefficients are associated with traits that are associated with invasion failure while negative values are associated with invasion success. F, failed invasion; S, successful invasion.)
| all | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coeff. | coeff. | coeff. | coeff. | |||||||||
| 90.127 | <0.001 | −0.023 | 33.009 | <0.001 | −0.018 | |||||||
| 5.936 | 0.015 | −0.672 | ||||||||||
| 20.811 | <0.001 | 0.065 | 18.658 | <0.001 | −0.119 | 4.395 | 0.036 | −0.018 | ||||
| 29.727 | <0.001 | 0.282 | 33.583 | <0.001 | 0.531 | |||||||
| 46.763 | <0.001 | 0.546 | ||||||||||
| 25.633 | <0.001 | −0.382 | ||||||||||
| 5.683 | 0.017 | 0.381 | ||||||||||
| 44.377 | <0.001 | 0.327 | 10.173 | 0.001 | 0.208 | |||||||
| 70.305 | <0.001 | −0.432 | ||||||||||
| 52.888 | <0.001 | −0.798 | ||||||||||
| 88.399 | <0.001 | 0.281 | ||||||||||
| 4.724 | 0.030 | 0.173 | ||||||||||
| 88.909 | <0.001 | −0.357 | ||||||||||
| 84.989 | <0.001 | 4.676 | ||||||||||
| 4.933 | 0.026 | −0.163 | ||||||||||
| 7.738 | 0.005 | −0.067 | 11.323 | <0.001 | −0.138 | |||||||
| 76.668 | <0.001 | −0.449 | 5.847 | 0.016 | −0.237 | 15.318 | <0.001 | −0.363 | 6.505 | 0.011 | −0.227 | |
| 180.891 | <0.001 | 0.392 | 32.621 | <0.001 | 0.279 | 116.256 | <0.001 | 0.336 | 294.019 | <0.001 | 0.569 | |
| 557.810 | <0.001 | −0.127 | 188.430 | <0.001 | −0.099 | 279.224 | <0.001 | −0.245 | 146.874 | <0.001 | −0.294 | |
| 5.945 | 0.015 | 0.028 | ||||||||||
| 9.397 | 0.002 | −0.032 | 10.272 | 0.001 | −0.078 | |||||||
| 123.971 | 0.000 | 0.176 | 60.903 | <0.001 | 0.235 | 137.198 | <0.001 | 0.198 | 20.257 | <0.001 | 0.074 | |
| 30.258 | <0.001 | −0.128 | 10.229 | 0.001 | −0.135 | |||||||
DA by SCL at t=2000 with web properties and fundamental and realized-niche properties of the invader for predicting invasion success showing effect size (F), p-value (p) and the standardized function coefficients (coeff.). (Blank spaces indicate that the variable was not selected in forward stepwise DA. Positive coefficients are associated with traits that are associated with invasion failure while negative values are associated with invasion success. F, failed invasion; S, successful invasion.)
| herbivores | herbivorous omnivores | secondary consumers | tertiary consumers | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coeff. | coeff. | coeff. | coeff. | |||||||||
| 130.129 | <0.001 | −0.032 | 168.026 | <0.001 | −0.026 | 15.751 | <0.001 | −0.010 | 3.986 | 0.049 | 0.022 | |
| 51.618 | <0.001 | 0.116 | 166.535 | <0.001 | 0.085 | |||||||
| 86.498 | <0.001 | −1.200 | ||||||||||
| 29.308 | <0.001 | 0.387 | 6.941 | 0.008 | 0.208 | 11.662 | 0.001 | 0.263 | ||||
| 16.231 | <0.001 | 0.520 | ||||||||||
| 6.305 | 0.012 | 0.236 | 24.581 | <0.001 | −1.598 | |||||||
| 12.345 | <0.001 | −0.528 | 21.876 | <0.001 | −0.852 | 38.087 | <0.001 | −5.140 | ||||
| 7.048 | 0.008 | 0.203 | 7.404 | 0.007 | 0.405 | |||||||
| 68.060 | <0.001 | 7.545 | ||||||||||
| 50.203 | <0.001 | −0.564 | 56.458 | <0.001 | −0.699 | 8.518 | 0.004 | −0.379 | ||||
| 14.546 | <0.001 | −0.287 | 17.137 | <0.001 | −0.644 | 19.660 | <0.001 | −1.560 | ||||
| 50.742 | <0.001 | 0.358 | 50.551 | <0.001 | 0.338 | |||||||
| 6.265 | 0.012 | −0.120 | 20.548 | <0.001 | 0.230 | 13.994 | <0.001 | 1.793 | ||||
| 38.839 | <0.001 | 0.419 | 18.043 | <0.001 | 0.376 | |||||||
| 19.211 | <0.001 | −0.162 | 42.904 | <0.001 | −0.263 | 91.117 | <0.001 | −0.344 | ||||
| 14.857 | <0.001 | −1.518 | ||||||||||
| 15.553 | <0.001 | −0.211 | ||||||||||
| 8.208 | 0.004 | −0.078 | 6.878 | 0.009 | −0.080 | |||||||
| 116.813 | <0.001 | −0.671 | 126.561 | <0.001 | −0.747 | |||||||
| 374.795 | <0.001 | 0.599 | 266.935 | <0.001 | 0.555 | 50.356 | <0.001 | −0.211 | ||||
| 291.168 | <0.001 | −0.108 | 157.167 | <0.001 | −0.088 | 846.182 | <0.001 | −0.298 | ||||
| 4.631 | 0.031 | 0.029 | ||||||||||
| 22.635 | <0.001 | −0.129 | ||||||||||
DA by C at t=4000 across all simulations combined (all) as well as within each C category separately for web properties and fundamental and realized-niche properties of the invader for predicting invasion success showing effect size (F), p-value (p) and the standardized function coefficients (coeff.). (Blank spaces indicate that the variable was not selected in forward stepwise DA. Positive coefficients are associated with traits that are associated with invasion failure while negative values are associated with invasion success. F, failed invasion; S, successful invasion.)
| all | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coeff. | coeff. | coeff. | coeff. | |||||||||
| 3.623 | 0.057 | −0.001 | 15.488 | <0.001 | 0.017 | |||||||
| 81.368 | <0.001 | −0.433 | 8.263 | 0.004 | 0.658 | |||||||
| 48.560 | <0.001 | −0.060 | 11.690 | 0.001 | −0.046 | |||||||
| 446.791 | <0.001 | 0.573 | 45.095 | <0.001 | 0.430 | 189.273 | <0.001 | 0.687 | 188.004 | <0.001 | 0.573 | |
| 29.164 | <0.001 | 0.082 | 19.891 | <0.001 | 0.120 | |||||||
| 21.063 | <0.001 | −0.279 | ||||||||||
| 50.220 | <0.001 | −0.408 | 106.963 | <0.001 | −1.114 | |||||||
| 94.647 | <0.001 | 0.712 | ||||||||||
| 25.128 | <0.001 | 0.194 | 41.896 | <0.001 | 0.399 | |||||||
| 4.640 | 0.031 | 0.057 | ||||||||||
| 15.490 | <0.001 | −0.134 | ||||||||||
| 7.832 | 0.005 | 0.044 | 9.788 | 0.002 | −0.067 | |||||||
| 10.317 | 0.001 | 0.060 | 6.899 | 0.009 | −0.033 | |||||||
| 285.379 | <0.001 | 0.354 | 10.833 | 0.001 | −0.145 | 72.832 | <0.001 | 0.334 | 172.947 | <0.001 | 0.420 | |
| 178.646 | <0.001 | 0.092 | 162.422 | <0.001 | 0.430 | 11.581 | 0.001 | 0.073 | 4.080 | 0.043 | 0.012 | |
| 55.493 | <0.001 | 0.449 | 48.353 | <0.001 | 0.843 | |||||||
| 7.542 | 0.006 | 0.032 | 7.230 | 0.007 | 0.039 | |||||||
| 474.830 | <0.001 | −0.150 | 105.600 | <0.001 | −0.128 | 290.156 | <0.001 | −0.189 | 444.991 | <0.001 | −0.191 | |
| 23.574 | <0.001 | 0.061 | 19.058 | <0.001 | 0.122 | 26.552 | <0.001 | 0.103 | 17.611 | <0.001 | 0.063 | |
| 3069.823 | <0.001 | 0.370 | 1249.502 | <0.001 | 0.443 | 822.751 | <0.001 | 0.304 | 1004.292 | <0.001 | 0.271 | |
| 1477.759 | <0.001 | −0.048 | 493.735 | <0.001 | −0.044 | 442.934 | <0.001 | −0.080 | 800.336 | <0.001 | −0.188 | |
| 1740.905 | <0.001 | −0.119 | 138.880 | <0.001 | −0.053 | 1153.384 | <0.001 | −0.167 | 2583.355 | <0.001 | −0.254 | |
| 2687.111 | <0.001 | −0.183 | 14 938.838 | <0.001 | −0.313 | 499.277 | <0.001 | −0.130 | 62.427 | <0.001 | −0.044 | |
| 799.516 | <0.001 | −0.203 | 457.020 | <0.001 | −0.255 | 984.770 | <0.001 | −0.383 | ||||
| 9.594 | 0.002 | −0.029 | 133.757 | <0.001 | 0.136 | 81.043 | <0.001 | −0.141 | 10.770 | 0.001 | −0.050 | |