Literature DB >> 15849267

Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America.

Jonathan M Jeschke1, David L Strayer.   

Abstract

Species become invasive if they (i) are introduced to a new range, (ii) establish themselves, and (iii) spread. To address the global problems caused by invasive species, several studies investigated steps ii and iii of this invasion process. However, only one previous study looked at step i and examined the proportion of species that have been introduced beyond their native range. We extend this research by investigating all three steps for all freshwater fish, mammals, and birds native to Europe or North America. A higher proportion of European species entered North America than vice versa. However, the introduction rate from Europe to North America peaked in the late 19th century, whereas it is still rising in the other direction. There is no clear difference in invasion success between the two directions, so neither the imperialism dogma (that Eurasian species are exceptionally successful invaders) is supported, nor is the contradictory hypothesis that North America offers more biotic resistance to invaders than Europe because of its less disturbed and richer biota. Our results do not support the tens rule either: that approximately 10% of all introduced species establish themselves and that approximately 10% of established species spread. We find a success of approximately 50% at each step. In comparison, only approximately 5% of native vertebrates were introduced in either direction. These figures show that, once a vertebrate is introduced, it has a high potential to become invasive. Thus, it is crucial to minimize the number of species introductions to effectively control invasive vertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15849267      PMCID: PMC1129111          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501271102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders.

Authors:  C S. Kolar; D M. Lodge
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes.

Authors:  Charles François Boudouresque; Marc Verlaque
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Realistic species losses disproportionately reduce grassland resistance to biological invaders.

Authors:  Erika S Zavaleta; Kristin B Hulvey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  42 in total

1.  Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe.

Authors:  Petr Pysek; Vojtech Jarosík; Philip E Hulme; Ingolf Kühn; Jan Wild; Margarita Arianoutsou; Sven Bacher; Francois Chiron; Viktoras Didziulis; Franz Essl; Piero Genovesi; Francesca Gherardi; Martin Hejda; Salit Kark; Philip W Lambdon; Marie-Laure Desprez-Loustau; Wolfgang Nentwig; Jan Pergl; Katja Poboljsaj; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Alain Roques; David B Roy; Susan Shirley; Wojciech Solarz; Montserrat Vilà; Marten Winter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt.

Authors:  Franz Essl; Stefan Dullinger; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Philip E Hulme; Karl Hülber; Vojtěch Jarošík; Ingrid Kleinbauer; Fridolin Krausmann; Ingolf Kühn; Wolfgang Nentwig; Montserrat Vilà; Piero Genovesi; Francesca Gherardi; Marie-Laure Desprez-Loustau; Alain Roques; Petr Pyšek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants.

Authors:  Andrew V Suarez; David A Holway; Philip S Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The success of animal invaders.

Authors:  M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits.

Authors:  Reuben P Keller; David M Lodge; David C Finnoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Broad-scale determinants of non-native fish species richness are context-dependent.

Authors:  Simon Blanchet; Fabien Leprieur; Olivier Beauchard; Jan Staes; Thierry Oberdorff; Sébastien Brosse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Variation in inflammation as a correlate of range expansion in Kenyan house sparrows.

Authors:  Lynn B Martin; Jennifer L Alam; Titus Imboma; Andrea L Liebl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The Tens Rule in invasion biology: measure of a true impact or our lack of knowledge and understanding?

Authors:  I Jarić; G Cvijanović
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Novel organisms: comparing invasive species, GMOs, and emerging pathogens.

Authors:  Jonathan M Jeschke; Felicia Keesing; Richard S Ostfeld
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 5.129

10.  Human-related processes drive the richness of exotic birds in Europe.

Authors:  François Chiron; Susan Shirley; Salit Kark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.