Literature DB >> 17503589

Trophic levels and trophic tangles: the prevalence of omnivory in real food webs.

Ross M Thompson1, Martin Hemberg, Brian M Starzomski, Jonathan B Shurin.   

Abstract

The concept of trophic levels is one of the oldest in ecology and informs our understanding of energy flow and top-down control within food webs, but it has been criticized for ignoring omnivory. We tested whether trophic levels were apparent in 58 real food webs in four habitat types by examining patterns of trophic position. A large proportion of taxa (64.4%) occupied integer trophic positions, suggesting that discrete trophic levels do exist. Importantly however, the majority of those trophic positions were aggregated around integer values of 0 and 1, representing plants and herbivores. For the majority of the real food webs considered here, secondary consumers were no more likely to occupy an integer trophic position than in randomized food webs. This means that, above the herbivore trophic level, food webs are better characterized as a tangled web of omnivores. Omnivory was most common in marine systems, rarest in streams, and intermediate in lakes and terrestrial food webs. Trophic-level-based concepts such as trophic cascades may apply to systems with short food chains, but they become less valid as food chains lengthen.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503589     DOI: 10.1890/05-1454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  35 in total

1.  Adaptive behaviour, tri-trophic food-web stability and damping of chaos.

Authors:  André W Visser; Patrizio Mariani; Simone Pigolotti
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Interactions among predators and the cascading effects of vertebrate insectivores on arthropod communities and plants.

Authors:  Kailen A Mooney; Daniel S Gruner; Nicholas A Barber; Sunshine A Van Bael; Stacy M Philpott; Russell Greenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs.

Authors:  Jonathan B Shurin; Daniel S Gruner; Helmut Hillebrand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Complex life cycles in a pond food web: effects of life stage structure and parasites on network properties, trophic positions and the fit of a probabilistic niche model.

Authors:  Daniel L Preston; Abigail Z Jacobs; Sarah A Orlofske; Pieter T J Johnson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A test of trophic cascade theory: fish and benthic assemblages across a predator density gradient on coral reefs.

Authors:  Jordan M Casey; Andrew H Baird; Simon J Brandl; Mia O Hoogenboom; Justin R Rizzari; Ashley J Frisch; Christopher E Mirbach; Sean R Connolly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Complex impacts of an invasive omnivore and native consumers on stream communities in California and Hawaii.

Authors:  Kristie Klose; Scott D Cooper
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The trophic vacuum and the evolution of complex life cycles in trophically transmitted helminths.

Authors:  Daniel P Benesh; James C Chubb; Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Stable nitrogen isotopic composition of amino acids reveals food web structure in stream ecosystems.

Authors:  Naoto F Ishikawa; Yoshikazu Kato; Hiroyuki Togashi; Mayumi Yoshimura; Chikage Yoshimizu; Noboru Okuda; Ichiro Tayasu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Top-down effects of an invasive omnivore: detection in long-term monitoring of large-river reservoir chlorophyll-a.

Authors:  Benjamin B Tumolo; Michael B Flinn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Producer nutritional quality controls ecosystem trophic structure.

Authors:  Just Cebrian; Jonathan B Shurin; Elizabeth T Borer; Bradley J Cardinale; Jacqueline T Ngai; Melinda D Smith; William F Fagan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.