Literature DB >> 26606938

A data-driven approach for quality assessment of radiologic interpretations.

William Hsu1, Simon X Han2, Corey W Arnold2, Alex At Bui2, Dieter R Enzmann2.   

Abstract

Given the increasing emphasis on delivering high-quality, cost-efficient healthcare, improved methodologies are needed to measure the accuracy and utility of ordered diagnostic examinations in achieving the appropriate diagnosis. Here, we present a data-driven approach for performing automated quality assessment of radiologic interpretations using other clinical information (e.g., pathology) as a reference standard for individual radiologists, subspecialty sections, imaging modalities, and entire departments. Downstream diagnostic conclusions from the electronic medical record are utilized as "truth" to which upstream diagnoses generated by radiology are compared. The described system automatically extracts and compares patient medical data to characterize concordance between clinical sources. Initial results are presented in the context of breast imaging, matching 18 101 radiologic interpretations with 301 pathology diagnoses and achieving a precision and recall of 84% and 92%, respectively. The presented data-driven method highlights the challenges of integrating multiple data sources and the application of information extraction tools to facilitate healthcare quality improvement.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  information storage and retrieval; mammography; pathology; quality improvement; radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26606938      PMCID: PMC4954616          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  7 in total

1.  Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Authors:  M A Lacquement; D Mitchell; A B Hollingsworth
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The Mammography Quality Standards Act. An overview of the regulations and guidance.

Authors:  B S Monsees
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.

Authors:  James P Borgstede; Rebecca S Lewis; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Karl N Krecke; Rafael Miranda; Catherine C Roberts; Charles Denham
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5.  Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future.

Authors:  Shmuel Mahgerefteh; Jonathan B Kruskal; Chun S Yam; Arye Blachar; Jacob Sosna
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Gary M Longton; Patricia A Carney; Berta M Geller; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Heidi D Nelson; Margaret S Pepe; Kimberly H Allison; Stuart J Schnitt; Frances P O'Malley; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.

Authors:  L Liberman; A F Abramson; F B Squires; J R Glassman; E A Morris; D D Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  A clinical text classification paradigm using weak supervision and deep representation.

Authors:  Yanshan Wang; Sunghwan Sohn; Sijia Liu; Feichen Shen; Liwei Wang; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Shreyasee Amin; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 2.  Clinical information extraction applications: A literature review.

Authors:  Yanshan Wang; Liwei Wang; Majid Rastegar-Mojarad; Sungrim Moon; Feichen Shen; Naveed Afzal; Sijia Liu; Yuqun Zeng; Saeed Mehrabi; Sunghwan Sohn; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Current approaches to identify sections within clinical narratives from electronic health records: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexandra Pomares-Quimbaya; Markus Kreuzthaler; Stefan Schulz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Collecting specialty-related medical terms: Development and evaluation of a resource for Spanish.

Authors:  Pilar López-Úbeda; Alexandra Pomares-Quimbaya; Manuel Carlos Díaz-Galiano; Stefan Schulz
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Structured reporting of computed tomography in the staging of colon cancer: a Delphi consensus proposal.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Lorenzo Faggioni; Roberta Grassi; Roberta Fusco; Alfonso Reginelli; Daniela Rega; Nicola Maggialetti; Duccio Buccicardi; Barbara Frittoli; Marco Rengo; Chandra Bortolotto; Roberto Prost; Giorgia Viola Lacasella; Marco Montella; Eleonora Ciaghi; Francesco Bellifemine; Federica De Muzio; Giulia Grazzini; Massimo De Filippo; Salvatore Cappabianca; Andrea Laghi; Roberto Grassi; Luca Brunese; Emanuele Neri; Vittorio Miele; Francesca Coppola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Francesca Coppola; Roberta Grassi; Roberta Fusco; Salvatore Tafuto; Francesco Izzo; Alfonso Reginelli; Nicola Maggialetti; Duccio Buccicardi; Barbara Frittoli; Marco Rengo; Chandra Bortolotto; Roberto Prost; Giorgia Viola Lacasella; Marco Montella; Eleonora Ciaghi; Francesco Bellifemine; Federica De Muzio; Ginevra Danti; Giulia Grazzini; Massimo De Filippo; Salvatore Cappabianca; Carmelo Barresi; Franco Iafrate; Luca Pio Stoppino; Andrea Laghi; Roberto Grassi; Luca Brunese; Emanuele Neri; Vittorio Miele; Lorenzo Faggioni
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.