Literature DB >> 19444597

Functional capacity evaluation in subjects with early osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee; is two-day testing needed?

M W van Ittersum1, H J Bieleman, M F Reneman, F G J Oosterveld, J W Groothoff, C P van der Schans.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Work Well Functional Capacity Evaluation (WW FCE) is a two-day performance based test consisting of several work-related activities. Three lifting and carrying test items may be performed on both days. The objective of this study was to assess the need for repeated testing of these items in subjects with early osteoarthritis of the hip and/or the knee and to analyze sources of variation between the 2 days of measurement.
METHODS: A standardized WW FCE protocol was applied, including repeated testing of lifting low, lifting overhead and carrying. Differences and associations between the 2 days were calculated using paired samples t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA). Possible sources of individual variation between the 2 days were identified by Wilcoxon signed ranks tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for differences in performances between days and differences in possible sources of variation between days.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine subjects participated in this study, their mean (SD) age was 56.6 (4.8) years, median (min-max) WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) index scores for pain, stiffness and physical function were 5 (0-17), 3 (0-7) and 14 (0-49), respectively. Median (min-max) SF36 physical function was 75 (5-95), and SF36 pain score was 67 (12-76). Mean performance differences ranged from -0.2 to -0.8 kg (P > 0.05). ICC's ranged from 0.75 (lifting overhead) to 0.88 (lifting low). LoA were: lifting low 8.0 kg; lifting overhead 6.5 kg; carrying 9.0 kg. Pearson's correlations were low and non-significant.
CONCLUSIONS: All three tests show acceptable two-day consistency. WW FCE testing on two consecutive days is not necessary for groups of subjects with early osteoarthritis. Individual sources of variation could not be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19444597     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9179-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  25 in total

1.  Responsiveness of observational and self-report methods for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M P Steultjens; L D Roorda; J Dekker; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-02

2.  Direct and indirect costs attributable to osteoarthritis in active subjects.

Authors:  Véronique Rabenda; Christelle Manette; Régine Lemmens; Anne-Marie Mariani; Nicole Struvay; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Marina Carotti; Andrea Stancati; Walter Grassi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Quality of life in elderly subjects with pain in the hip or knee.

Authors:  M Hopman-Rock; F W Kraaimaat; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients.

Authors:  Paul W Stratford; Deborah M Kennedy
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  A critical review of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  P M King; N Tuckwell; T E Barrett
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08

8.  Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker's compensation environment.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

Review 9.  Osteoarthritis: epidemiology.

Authors:  Nigel Arden; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 10.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: prevalence, risk factors and functional impact.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Corti; Chiara Rigon
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  5 in total

1.  A short-form functional capacity evaluation predicts time to recovery but not sustained return-to-work.

Authors:  Erin N Branton; Kelly M Arnold; Sheena R Appelt; Megan M Hodges; Michele C Battié; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

2.  Trajectories of Physical Work Capacity in Early Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of Hip and Knee: Results from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) Study.

Authors:  H J Bieleman; R Stewart; M F Reneman; W M van Ittersum; C P van der Schans; K W Drossaers-Bakker; F G J Oosterveld
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-09

3.  Functional capacity of people with early osteoarthritis: a comparison between subjects from the cohort hip and cohort knee (CHECK) and healthy ageing workers.

Authors:  H J Bieleman; M W van Ittersum; J W Groothoff; J C M Oostveen; F G J Oosterveld; C P van der Schans; R Soer; M F Reneman
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sebastian Bieniek; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Reliability and safety of functional capacity evaluation in patients with whiplash associated disorders.

Authors:  M A Trippolini; M F Reneman; B Jansen; P U Dijkstra; J H B Geertzen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.