Literature DB >> 20182909

A short-form functional capacity evaluation predicts time to recovery but not sustained return-to-work.

Erin N Branton1, Kelly M Arnold, Sheena R Appelt, Megan M Hodges, Michele C Battié, Douglas P Gross.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of a short-form FCE to predict future timely and sustained return-to-work.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using data collected during a cluster RCT. Subject performance on the items in the short-form FCE was compared to administrative recovery outcomes from a workers' compensation database. Outcomes included days to claim closure, days to time loss benefit suspension and future recurrence (defined as re-opening a closed claim, restarting benefits, or filing a new claim for injury to the same body region). Analysis included multivariable Cox and logistic regression using a risk factor modeling strategy. Potential confounders included age, sex, injury duration, and job attachment status, among others.
RESULTS: The sample included 147 compensation claimants with a variety of musculoskeletal injuries. Subjects who demonstrated job demand levels on all FCE items were more likely to have their claims closed (adjusted Hazard Ratio 5.52 (95% Confidence Interval 3.42-8.89), and benefits suspended (adjusted Hazard Ratio 5.45 (95% Confidence Interval 2.73-10.85) over the follow-up year. The proportion of variance explained by the FCE ranged from 18 to 27%. FCE performance was not significantly associated with future recurrence.
CONCLUSION: A short-form FCE appears to provide useful information for predicting time to recovery as measured through administrative outcomes, but not injury recurrence. The short-form FCE may be an efficient option for clinicians using FCE in the management of injured workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182909     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-010-9233-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  21 in total

1.  Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-04

2.  Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: case of low back pain.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Santosh Verma; Glenn Pransky; Barbara Webster
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 3.  Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.

Authors:  Vincent Gouttebarge; Haije Wind; P Paul F M Kuijer; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Douglas Paul Gross; Michele Crites Battié
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

5.  Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Wietske Kuijer; Sandra Brouwer; H R Schiphorst Preuper; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-06

6.  Development and validation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation for use in claimants with low back disorders.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié; Alexander Asante
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03

7.  Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  M F Reneman; P U Dijkstra; M Westmaas; L N H Göeken
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

8.  A critical review of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  P M King; N Tuckwell; T E Barrett
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08

9.  The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2: sustained recovery.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The Pain Disability Index: factor structure and normative data.

Authors:  J T Chibnall; R C Tait
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  7 in total

1.  Updating the Evidence on Functional Capacity Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stijn De Baets; Patrick Calders; Noortje Schalley; Katrien Vermeulen; Sofie Vertriest; Lien Van Peteghem; Marieke Coussens; Fransiska Malfait; Guy Vanderstraeten; Geert Van Hove; Dominique Van de Velde
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-09

2.  Impact of Functional Capacity Evaluation on Patient-Reported Functional Ability: An Exploratory Diagnostic Before-After Study.

Authors:  Martin Schindl; Sylvia Wassipaul; Tanja Wagner; Karin Gstaltner; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-12

3.  Sustained employability of workers in a production environment: design of a stepped wedge trial to evaluate effectiveness and cost-benefit of the POSE program.

Authors:  Berry J van Holland; Michiel R de Boer; Sandra Brouwer; Remko Soer; Michiel F Reneman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review.

Authors:  P P F M Kuijer; V Gouttebarge; S Brouwer; M F Reneman; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Self-Reported and Tested Function in Health Care Workers with Musculoskeletal Disorders on Full, Partial or Not on Sick Leave.

Authors:  Tove Ask; Jan Sture Skouen; Jörg Assmus; Alice Kvåle
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-09

Review 6.  Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Ivan A Steenstra; Claire Munhall; Emma Irvin; Nelson Oranye; Steven Passmore; Dwayne Van Eerd; Quenby Mahood; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

7.  Do patient characteristics affect the predictive validity of Functional Capacity Evaluations?

Authors:  David Bühne; Torsten Alles; Christian Hetzel; Marco Streibelt; Ingo Froböse
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.851

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.