Literature DB >> 19442962

Spontaneous corneal clearance despite graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Chandra Balachandran1, Lisanne Ham, Christianne A Verschoor, T San Ong, Jacqueline van der Wees, Gerrit R J Melles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe spontaneous recovery of corneal transparency in 2 cases with nearly complete graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
DESIGN: Case series.
METHODS: In 2 patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, DMEK was performed. Through a 3-mm clear corneal tunnel incision, the recipient Descemet membrane and its endothelium was stripped off from the posterior stroma. A 9.5-mm diameter organ-cultured Descemet roll was inserted into a recipient anterior chamber, positioned onto the posterior stroma, and secured by a complete air filling of the anterior chamber for 45 minutes.
RESULTS: At 1 month after uneventful DMEK, both transplanted corneas showed decompensation attributable to subtotal graft detachment. Unexpectedly, corneal transparency improved spontaneously, and at 3 months, both transplanted corneas had a normal pachymetry, despite persistent graft detachment. The patients' visual acuities improved to 20/50 (0.4) and 20/25 (0.8) at 3 months to 20/28 (0.7) and 20/20 (1.0), respectively at 9 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal clearance in the presence of a detached DMEK graft is not consistent with the current concept of endothelial keratoplasty, which requires an (attached) donor endothelial cell layer at the recipient posterior corneal surface. Endothelial transfer, migration, regeneration, or a combination thereof from either the donor or the recipient may explain the visual recovery. These observations suggest that a review of our approach to endothelial keratoplasty and the management of corneal endothelial disorders may be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442962     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  22 in total

1.  Existence of Neural Crest-Derived Progenitor Cells in Normal and Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy Corneal Endothelium.

Authors:  Kishore Reddy Katikireddy; Thore Schmedt; Marianne O Price; Francis W Price; Ula V Jurkunas
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  [Descemetectomy : An alternative to transplantation?]

Authors:  E L Bramann; K Schröder; S Schrader; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Existence of Corneal Endothelial Slow-Cycling Cells.

Authors:  Edgar M Espana; Mei Sun; David E Birk
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Spontaneous corneal clearing after Descemet's stripping without endothelial replacement.

Authors:  Rupa D Shah; J Bradley Randleman; Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Incidental central tear in Descemet membrane endothelial complex during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vikas Mittal; Ruchi Mittal; Rajat Jain; Virender S Sangwan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-27

6.  Comparison of corneal haze and visual outcome in primary DSAEK versus DSAEK following failed DMEK.

Authors:  Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; José L Hernández-Verdejo; Noelia Oblanca; Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete; Maria P De Miguel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Comparison of proliferative capacity of genetically-engineered pig and human corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Minoru Fujita; Ruhina Mehra; Seung Eun Lee; Danny S Roh; Cassandra Long; James L Funderburgh; David L Ayares; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: From DLEK to DMEK.

Authors:  Mark M Fernandez; Natalie A Afshari
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

9.  Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  T Röck; M Bramkamp; K U Bartz-Schmidt; D Röck; E Yörük
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  What does the future hold for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy; will 'keratoplasty' still be a valid procedure?

Authors:  M Bruinsma; C M Tong; G R J Melles
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.