Literature DB >> 19436989

Homoplasy corrected estimation of genetic similarity from AFLP bands, and the effect of the number of bands on the precision of estimation.

Gerrit Gort1, Theo van Hintum, Fred van Eeuwijk.   

Abstract

AFLP is a DNA fingerprinting technique, resulting in binary band presence-absence patterns, called profiles, with known or unknown band positions. We model AFLP as a sampling procedure of fragments, with lengths sampled from a distribution. Bands represent fragments of specific lengths. We focus on estimation of pairwise genetic similarity, defined as average fraction of common fragments, by AFLP. Usual estimators are Dice (D) or Jaccard coefficients. D overestimates genetic similarity, since identical bands in profile pairs may correspond to different fragments (homoplasy). Another complicating factor is the occurrence of different fragments of equal length within a profile, appearing as a single band, which we call collision. The bias of D increases with larger numbers of bands, and lower genetic similarity. We propose two homoplasy- and collision-corrected estimators of genetic similarity. The first is a modification of D, replacing band counts by estimated fragment counts. The second is a maximum likelihood estimator, only applicable if band positions are available. Properties of the estimators are studied by simulation. Standard errors and confidence intervals for the first are obtained by bootstrapping, and for the second by likelihood theory. The estimators are nearly unbiased, and have for most practical cases smaller standard error than D. The likelihood-based estimator generally gives the highest precision. The relationship between fragment counts and precision is studied using simulation. The usual range of band counts (50-100) appears nearly optimal. The methodology is illustrated using data from a phylogenetic study on lettuce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19436989      PMCID: PMC2715462          DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1047-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  22 in total

1.  A simple method for the detection of size homoplasy among amplified fragment length polymorphism fragments.

Authors:  P C O'Hanlon; R Peakall
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Genome and species relationships in genus Avena based on RAPD and AFLP molecular markers.

Authors:  A Drossou; A Katsiotis; J M Leggett; M Loukas; S Tsakas
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Genetic distance sampling: a novel sampling method for obtaining core collections using genetic distances with an application to cultivated lettuce.

Authors:  J Jansen; Th van Hintum
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Amplified fragment length polymorphism mapping of quantitative trait loci for malaria parasite susceptibility in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Daibin Zhong; David M Menge; Emmanuel A Temu; Hong Chen; Guiyun Yan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphisms in phylogenetics: a comparison of homology within and between genomes.

Authors:  David M Althoff; Matthew A Gitzendanner; Kari A Segraves
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Impact of amplified fragment length polymorphism size homoplasy on the estimation of population genetic diversity and the detection of selective loci.

Authors:  Armando Caballero; Humberto Quesada; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Optimizing automated AFLP scoring parameters to improve phylogenetic resolution.

Authors:  Barbara R Holland; Andrew C Clarke; Heidi M Meudt
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  P Vos; R Hogers; M Bleeker; M Reijans; T van de Lee; M Hornes; A Frijters; J Pot; J Peleman; M Kuiper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Differentiation of Campylobacter species by AFLP fingerprinting.

Authors:  Birgitta Duim; Peter A R Vandamme; Alan Rigter; Severine Laevens; Jeroen R Dijkstra; Jaap A Wagenaar
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Genetic diversity analysis using lowly polymorphic dominant markers: the example of AFLP in pigs.

Authors:  J-L Foulley; M G M van Schriek; L Alderson; Y Amigues; M Bagga; M-Y Boscher; B Brugmans; R Cardellino; R Davoli; J V Delgado; E Fimland; G C Gandini; P Glodek; M A M Groenen; K Hammond; B Harlizius; H Heuven; R Joosten; A M Martinez; D Matassino; J-N Meyer; J Peleman; A M Ramos; A P Rattink; V Russo; K W Siggens; J L Vega-Pla; L Ollivier
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.645

View more
  7 in total

1.  Extent and genome-wide distribution of linkage disequilibrium in commercial maize germplasm.

Authors:  Delphine Van Inghelandt; Jochen C Reif; Baldev S Dhillon; Pascal Flament; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Amplified fragment length homoplasy: in silico analysis for model and non-model species.

Authors:  Margot Paris; Benjamin Bonnes; Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Bénédicte N Poncet; Laurence Després
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Genetic diversity analysis of elite European maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines using AFLP, SSR, and SNP markers reveals ascertainment bias for a subset of SNPs.

Authors:  Elisabetta Frascaroli; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  AFLP-AFLP in silico-NGS approach reveals polymorphisms in repetitive elements in the malignant genome.

Authors:  Jitka Koblihova; Klara Srutova; Monika Krutska; Hana Klamova; Katerina Machova Polakova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Advances in plant gene-targeted and functional markers: a review.

Authors:  Péter Poczai; Ildikó Varga; Maarja Laos; András Cseh; Neil Bell; Jari Pt Valkonen; Jaakko Hyvönen
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.993

6.  Genomic distribution of AFLP markers relative to gene locations for different eukaryotic species.

Authors:  Armando Caballero; María Jesús García-Pereira; Humberto Quesada
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers: A potential resource for studies in plant molecular biology(1.).

Authors:  Daniel W H Robarts; Andrea D Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 1.936

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.