Literature DB >> 17562471

The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphisms in phylogenetics: a comparison of homology within and between genomes.

David M Althoff1, Matthew A Gitzendanner, Kari A Segraves.   

Abstract

The amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) technique is being increasingly used in phylogenetic studies, especially in groups of rapidly radiating taxa. One of the key issues in the phylogenetic suitability of this technique is whether the DNA fragments generated via the AFLP method are homologous within and among the taxa being studied. We used a bioinformatics approach to assess homology based on both chromosomal location and sequence similarity of AFLP fragments. The AFLP technique was electronically simulated on genomes from eight organisms that represented a range of genome sizes. The results demonstrated that within a genome, the number of fragments is positively associated with genome size, and the degree of homology decreases with increasing numbers of fragments generated. The average homology of fragments was 89% for small genomes (< 400 Mb) but decreased to 59% for large genomes (> 2 Gb). Fragment homology for large genomes can be increased by excluding smaller fragments, although there is no clear upper limit for the size of fragments to exclude. A second approach is to increase the number of selective nucleotides in the final selective amplification step. For strains of the same organism, homology based on chromosome location and sequence similarity of fragments was 100%. Fragment homology for more distantly related taxa, however, decreased with greater time since divergence. We conclude that AFLP data are best suited for examining phylogeographic patterns within species and among very recently diverged species.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562471     DOI: 10.1080/10635150701427077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  29 in total

1.  Identifying and reducing AFLP genotyping error: an example of tradeoffs when comparing population structure in broadcast spawning versus brooding oysters.

Authors:  H Zhang; M P Hare
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences.

Authors:  Milee Agarwal; Neeta Shrivastava; Harish Padh
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Impact of amplified fragment length polymorphism size homoplasy on the estimation of population genetic diversity and the detection of selective loci.

Authors:  Armando Caballero; Humberto Quesada; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  AFLP variation in 25 Avena species.

Authors:  Yong-Bi Fu; David J Williams
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  AFLPs support deep relationships among darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) consistent with morphological hypotheses.

Authors:  T A Smith; T C Mendelson; L M Page
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Amplified fragment length homoplasy: in silico analysis for model and non-model species.

Authors:  Margot Paris; Benjamin Bonnes; Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Bénédicte N Poncet; Laurence Després
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  The genetic architecture of a complex ecological trait: host plant use in the specialist moth, Heliothis subflexa.

Authors:  Sara J Oppenheim; Fred Gould; Keith R Hopper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Homoplasy corrected estimation of genetic similarity from AFLP bands, and the effect of the number of bands on the precision of estimation.

Authors:  Gerrit Gort; Theo van Hintum; Fred van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  A single origin of Batesian mimicry among hybridizing populations of admiral butterflies (Limenitis arthemis) rejects an evolutionary reversion to the ancestral phenotype.

Authors:  Wesley K Savage; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  A striking lack of genetic diversity across the wide-ranging amphibian Gastrophryne carolinensis (Anura: Microhylidae).

Authors:  Robert Makowsky; Jason Chesser; Leslie J Rissler
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.