BACKGROUND: School-based screening for health conditions can help extend the reach of health services to underserved populations. Screening for mental health conditions is growing in acceptability, but evidence of cost-effectiveness is lacking. This study assessed costs and effectiveness associated with the Developmental Pathways Screening Program, in which students undergo universal classroom emotional health screening and those who have positive screens are provided with on-site clinical evaluation and referral. METHODS: Costs are enumerated for screening and clinical evaluation in terms of labor and overhead and summarized as cost per enrolled student, per positive screen, and per referral. Cost-effectiveness is summarized as cost per student successfully linked to services. School demographics are used to generate a predictive formula for estimating the proportion of students likely to screen positive in a particular school, which can be used to estimate program cost. RESULTS: Screening costs ranged from $8.88 to $13.64 per enrolled student, depending on the prevalence of positive screens in a school. Of students referred for services, 72% were linked to supportive services within 6 weeks. Cost-effectiveness was estimated to be $416.90 per successful linkage when 5% screened positive and $106.09 when 20% screened positive. A formula to estimate the proportion of students screening positive proved accurate to within 5%. CONCLUSION: Information concerning costs and effectiveness of school-based emotional health screening programs can guide school districts in making decisions concerning resource allocation.
BACKGROUND: School-based screening for health conditions can help extend the reach of health services to underserved populations. Screening for mental health conditions is growing in acceptability, but evidence of cost-effectiveness is lacking. This study assessed costs and effectiveness associated with the Developmental Pathways Screening Program, in which students undergo universal classroom emotional health screening and those who have positive screens are provided with on-site clinical evaluation and referral. METHODS: Costs are enumerated for screening and clinical evaluation in terms of labor and overhead and summarized as cost per enrolled student, per positive screen, and per referral. Cost-effectiveness is summarized as cost per student successfully linked to services. School demographics are used to generate a predictive formula for estimating the proportion of students likely to screen positive in a particular school, which can be used to estimate program cost. RESULTS: Screening costs ranged from $8.88 to $13.64 per enrolled student, depending on the prevalence of positive screens in a school. Of students referred for services, 72% were linked to supportive services within 6 weeks. Cost-effectiveness was estimated to be $416.90 per successful linkage when 5% screened positive and $106.09 when 20% screened positive. A formula to estimate the proportion of students screening positive proved accurate to within 5%. CONCLUSION: Information concerning costs and effectiveness of school-based emotional health screening programs can guide school districts in making decisions concerning resource allocation.
Authors: Ann Vander Stoep; Elizabeth McCauley; Kelly A Thompson; Jerald R Herting; Elena S Kuo; David G Stewart; Cheryl A Anderson; Siri Kushner Journal: J Emot Behav Disord Date: 2005-12
Authors: D Shaffer; P Fisher; M K Dulcan; M Davies; J Piacentini; M E Schwab-Stone; B B Lahey; K Bourdon; P S Jensen; H R Bird; G Canino; D A Regier Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Andre Sourander; Peter Jensen; Mark Davies; Solja Niemelä; Henrik Elonheimo; Terja Ristkari; Hans Helenius; Lauri Sillanmäki; Jorma Piha; Kirsti Kumpulainen; Tuula Tamminen; Irma Moilanen; Fredrik Almqvist Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Maggie Chartier; Ann Vander Stoep; Elizabeth McCauley; Jerald R Herting; Melissa Tracy; James Lymp Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Davene R Wright; S Bryn Austin; H LeAnn Noh; Yushan Jiang; Kendrin R Sonneville Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Eric J Bruns; Mylien T Duong; Aaron R Lyon; Michael D Pullmann; Clayton R Cook; Douglas Cheney; Elizabeth McCauley Journal: Am J Orthopsychiatry Date: 2016-03
Authors: Elizabeth H Connors; Kathryn Moffa; Taneisha Carter; John Crocker; Jill H Bohnenkamp; Nancy A Lever; Sharon A Hoover Journal: Psychol Sch Date: 2022-02-12
Authors: Jennifer Greif Green; Margarita Alegría; Ronald C Kessler; Katie A McLaughlin; Michael J Gruber; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2015-01
Authors: Jose A Piqueras; Mariola Garcia-Olcina; Maria Rivera-Riquelme; Tiscar Rodriguez-Jimenez; Agustin E Martinez-Gonzalez; Pim Cuijpers Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 2.692