Literature DB >> 18307611

Passive versus active parental permission: implications for the ability of school-based depression screening to reach youth at risk.

Maggie Chartier1, Ann Vander Stoep, Elizabeth McCauley, Jerald R Herting, Melissa Tracy, James Lymp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is prevalent among children and adolescents and often goes untreated with adverse effects on academic success and healthy development. Depression screening can facilitate early identification and timely referral to prevention and treatment programs. Conducting school-based emotional health screening, however, raises the controversial issue of how to obtain informed parental permission.
METHODS: During implementation of a depression screening program in an urban school district in the Pacific Northwest, the district's parental permission protocol changed from passive (information provided to parents via a school mailer with parents having the option to actively decline their child's participation) to active (information provided to parents via a school mailer requiring the written permission of the parents for their child's participation). This change provided an opportunity to examine differences in participation under these 2 conditions.
RESULTS: A total of 1533 students were enrolled in this program across both years. Compared to conditions of passive permission, participation was dramatically reduced when children were required to have written parental permission, dropping from 85% to 66% of eligible children. Furthermore, under conditions of active parental permission, participation decreased differentially among student subgroups with increased risk for depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of school-based emotional health screening programs requires careful consideration of how to inform and obtain permission from parents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18307611      PMCID: PMC2713664          DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00278.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  27 in total

1.  Differential attrition rates and active parental consent.

Authors:  F A Esbensen; M H Miller; T J Taylor; N He; A Freng
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Parental consent and adolescent risk behavior research.

Authors:  Beth Baldwin Tigges
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.176

3.  An outcome evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program.

Authors:  Robert H Aseltine; Robert DeMartino
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Passive versus active parental permission in school-based survey research: does the type of permission affect prevalence estimates of risk behaviors?

Authors:  Danice K Eaton; Richard Lowry; Nancy D Brener; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Laura Kann
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2004-12

5.  Universal Emotional Health Screening at the Middle School Transition.

Authors:  Ann Vander Stoep; Elizabeth McCauley; Kelly A Thompson; Jerald R Herting; Elena S Kuo; David G Stewart; Cheryl A Anderson; Siri Kushner
Journal:  J Emot Behav Disord       Date:  2005-12

6.  A clinical psychotherapy trial for adolescent depression comparing cognitive, family, and supportive therapy.

Authors:  D A Brent; D Holder; D Kolko; B Birmaher; M Baugher; C Roth; S Iyengar; B A Johnson
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1997-09

Review 7.  Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis.

Authors:  Michael V Maciosek; Ashley B Coffield; Nichol M Edwards; Thomas J Flottemesch; Michael J Goodman; Leif I Solberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Impact of consent procedures on reported levels of adolescent alcohol use.

Authors:  Kevin C Frissell; Denis M McCarthy; Elizabeth J D'Amico; Jane Metrik; Timothy P Ellingstad; Sandra A Brown
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2004-12

9.  Impaired but undiagnosed.

Authors:  A Angold; E J Costello; E M Farmer; B J Burns; A Erkanli
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.829

10.  Merging universal and indicated prevention programs: the Fast Track model. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  31 in total

1.  School-based screening for suicide risk: balancing costs and benefits.

Authors:  Michelle Scott; Holly Wilcox; Yanling Huo; J Blake Turner; Prudence Fisher; David Shaffer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A longitudinal study of the social and emotional predictors and consequences of cyber and traditional bullying victimisation.

Authors:  Donna Cross; Leanne Lester; Amy Barnes
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Evaluating Active Parental Consent Procedures for School Programming: Addressing the Sensitive Topic of Suicide Prevention.

Authors:  Christine M Wienke Totura; Krista Kutash; Christa D Labouliere; Marc S Karver
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.118

4.  School Climate as a Universal Intervention to Prevent Substance Use Initiation in Early Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Shay M Daily; Michael J Mann; Christa L Lilly; Thomas K Bias; Megan L Smith; Alfgeir L Kristjansson
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2020-04-12

5.  Recruitment of adolescents for a smoking study: use of traditional strategies and social media.

Authors:  Michelle A Rait; Judith J Prochaska; Mark L Rubinstein
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  How to identify students for school-based depression intervention: can school record review be substituted for universal depression screening?

Authors:  Elena S Kuo; Ann Vander Stoep; Jerald R Herting; Katherine Grupp; Elizabeth McCauley
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2012-10-24

7.  Cost-effectiveness of a school-based emotional health screening program.

Authors:  Elena Kuo; Ann Vander Stoep; Elizabeth McCauley; Mary A Kernic
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.118

8.  The Case for School-Based Depression Screening: Evidence From Established Programs.

Authors:  Erin McCormick; Kelly Thompson; Ann Vander Stoep; Elizabeth McCauley
Journal:  Rep Emot Behav Disord Youth       Date:  2009

9.  Addressing diabetes and depression in the school setting; the role of school nurses.

Authors:  Michelle D Owens-Gary; Pamela Allweiss
Journal:  NASN Sch Nurse       Date:  2013-01

10.  School Climate as an Intervention to Reduce Academic Failure and Educate the Whole Child: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Shay M Daily; Michael J Mann; Christa L Lilly; Angela M Dyer; Megan L Smith; Alfgeir L Kristjansson
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 2.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.