Literature DB >> 19431144

Tumor microvasculature supports proliferation and expansion of glioma-propagating cells.

Tijana Borovski1, Joost J C Verhoeff, Rosemarie ten Cate, Kate Cameron, Nienke A de Vries, Olaf van Tellingen, Dirk J Richel, Wouter R van Furth, Jan Paul Medema, Martin R Sprick.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. The identification of 'cancer stem cells' (CSC) has shed new light on the potential mechanism of therapy resistance of these tumors. Because these cells appear to be more resistant to conventional treatments, they are thought to drive tumor regrowth after therapy. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches that target these cells are needed. Tumor cells interact with their microenvironment. It has been reported that close contact between CSCs and tumor microvascular endothelium in GBM is important for CSCs to preserve their undifferentiated state and self-renewal ability. However, our understanding of this interaction is still rudimentary. This is in part due to a lack of suitable in vitro models that accurately represent the in vivo situation. Therefore, we set up a co-culture system consisting of primary brain tumor microvascular endothelial cells (tMVECs) and glioma propagating cells (GPCs) derived from biopsies of GBM patients. We found that tMVECs support the growth of GPCs resulting in higher proliferation rates comparing to GPCs cultured alone. This effect was dependent on direct contact between the 2 cell types. In contrast to GPCs, the FCS-cultured cell line U87 was stimulated by culturing on tMVEC-derived ECM alone, suggesting that both cell types interact different with their microenvironment. Together, these results demonstrate the feasibility and utility of our system to model the interaction of GPCs with their microenvironment. Identification of molecules that mediate this interaction could provide novel targets for directed therapy for GBM. 2009 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19431144     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  25 in total

1.  CD133+ niches and single cells in glioblastoma have different phenotypes.

Authors:  Karina Christensen; Henrik Daa Schrøder; Bjarne Winther Kristensen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  New promising drug targets in cancer- and metastasis-initiating cells.

Authors:  Murielle Mimeault; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Perivascular signals alter global gene expression profile of glioblastoma and response to temozolomide in a gelatin hydrogel.

Authors:  Mai T Ngo; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  ZIPK mediates endothelial cell contraction through myosin light chain phosphorylation and is required for ischemic-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Yiteng Zhang; Chenghai Zhang; He Zhang; Weiwei Zeng; Shuai Li; Caiping Chen; Xiaobin Song; Jie Sun; Zhiyuan Sun; Congcong Cui; Xiang Cao; Lirong Zheng; Pei Wang; Wei Zhao; Zhao Zhang; Yun Xu; Minsheng Zhu; Huaqun Chen
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Multidimensional hydrogel models reveal endothelial network angiocrine signals increase glioblastoma cell number, invasion, and temozolomide resistance.

Authors:  Mai T Ngo; Elijah Karvelis; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Macitentan, a Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist, in Combination with Temozolomide Leads to Glioblastoma Regression and Long-term Survival in Mice.

Authors:  Sun-Jin Kim; Ho Jeong Lee; Mark Seungwook Kim; Hyun Jin Choi; Junqin He; Qiuyu Wu; Kenneth Aldape; Jeffrey S Weinberg; W K Alfred Yung; Charles A Conrad; Robert R Langley; François Lehembre; Urs Regenass; Isaiah J Fidler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Cancer stem cells: the challenges ahead.

Authors:  Jan Paul Medema
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Suppression of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 3 expression is a feature of classical GBM that is required for maximal growth.

Authors:  B Mark Woerner; Jingqin Luo; Kristin R Brown; Erin Jackson; Sonika M Dahiya; Paul Mischel; Jeffrey L Benovic; David Piwnica-Worms; Joshua B Rubin
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.852

9.  A Novel Theranostic Strategy for MMP-14-Expressing Glioblastomas Impacts Survival.

Authors:  Suchismita Mohanty; Zixin Chen; Kai Li; Goreti Ribeiro Morais; Jessica Klockow; Ketan Yerneni; Laura Pisani; Frederick T Chin; Siddharta Mitra; Samuel Cheshier; Edwin Chang; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Jianghong Rao; Paul M Loadman; Robert A Falconer; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 10.  Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg; Michael A Koldobskiy; Anita Göndör
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.