Christopher M Owen1, Mark E Linskey. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Orange, CA 92868-3298, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In the modern era of frameless stereotaxis (FL), the role of frame-based (FB) stereotactic needle biopsy is evolving. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospective database of 106 lesions in 91 consecutive patients undergoing FB stereotactic needle biopsy with a systematic "geologic core" technique by a single surgeon. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated comparing biopsy diagnosis with final pathology in 11 patients who underwent subsequent surgical resection. All instances of intra-operative bleeding through the needle were prospectively noted and compared with post-biopsy CT scan. Lesions were classified as risky for FL technique if they were (1) infratentorial or pineal, (2) within 10 mm of the circle of Willis or root of the Sylvian fissure, or (3) within 10 mm of deep cerebral veins. RESULTS: Diagnostic yield was 94%. Diagnostic accuracy was 91%. Of 18 lesions involving the corpus callosum, 13 (72.2%) were GBM 2 were anaplastic astrocytoma, and 1 each were found to be anaplastic oligodendroglioma, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and tumescent MS. Of 25 multifocal lesions, malignant primary brain tumor was diagnosed in 17 (68%) (11 GBM, 3 PCNSL, 2 anaplastic ologodendroglioma, and 1 anaplastic astrocytoma). Mortality was 0%. Three patients developed temporary neurologic deficits and one had permanent deficit. Absence of persistent blood through the biopsy needle had a negative predicative value of 98.8% for subsequent neuroimaging blood >5 mm diameter. According to our criteria, 80% of patients would have been candidates for FL biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic biopsy is an effective, safe and important technique for histologic diagnosis of brain lesions, particularly for multifocal and corpus callosum lesions. Post-biopsy CT can be safely reserved for patients who demonstrate persistent bleeding through the biopsy needle. FB stereotaxy remains an important technique for the 20% with small or deep seated lesions or when it is advantageous to avoid an incision, a burr hole or general anesthesia.
INTRODUCTION: In the modern era of frameless stereotaxis (FL), the role of frame-based (FB) stereotactic needle biopsy is evolving. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospective database of 106 lesions in 91 consecutive patients undergoing FB stereotactic needle biopsy with a systematic "geologic core" technique by a single surgeon. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated comparing biopsy diagnosis with final pathology in 11 patients who underwent subsequent surgical resection. All instances of intra-operative bleeding through the needle were prospectively noted and compared with post-biopsy CT scan. Lesions were classified as risky for FL technique if they were (1) infratentorial or pineal, (2) within 10 mm of the circle of Willis or root of the Sylvian fissure, or (3) within 10 mm of deep cerebral veins. RESULTS: Diagnostic yield was 94%. Diagnostic accuracy was 91%. Of 18 lesions involving the corpus callosum, 13 (72.2%) were GBM 2 were anaplastic astrocytoma, and 1 each were found to be anaplastic oligodendroglioma, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and tumescent MS. Of 25 multifocal lesions, malignant primary brain tumor was diagnosed in 17 (68%) (11 GBM, 3 PCNSL, 2 anaplastic ologodendroglioma, and 1 anaplastic astrocytoma). Mortality was 0%. Three patients developed temporary neurologic deficits and one had permanent deficit. Absence of persistent blood through the biopsy needle had a negative predicative value of 98.8% for subsequent neuroimaging blood >5 mm diameter. According to our criteria, 80% of patients would have been candidates for FL biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic biopsy is an effective, safe and important technique for histologic diagnosis of brain lesions, particularly for multifocal and corpus callosum lesions. Post-biopsy CT can be safely reserved for patients who demonstrate persistent bleeding through the biopsy needle. FB stereotaxy remains an important technique for the 20% with small or deep seated lesions or when it is advantageous to avoid an incision, a burr hole or general anesthesia.
Authors: Graeme F Woodworth; Matthew J McGirt; Amer Samdani; Ira Garonzik; Alessandro Olivi; Jon D Weingart Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Yi Lu; Cecil Yeung; Alireza Radmanesh; Robert Wiemann; Peter M Black; Alexandra J Golby Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Christine A Edwards; Aaron E Rusheen; Yoonbae Oh; Seungleal B Paek; Joshua Jacobs; Kristen H Lee; Kendall D Dennis; Kevin E Bennet; Abbas Z Kouzani; Kendall H Lee; Stephan J Goerss Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Betty Y S Kim; Wen Jiang; Jason Beiko; Sujit S Prabhu; Franco DeMonte; Mark R Gilbert; Raymond Sawaya; Kenneth D Aldape; Daniel P Cahill; Ian E McCutcheon Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Ruben Dammers; Joost W Schouten; Iain K Haitsma; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Johan M Kros; Clemens M F Dirven Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Neda Haj-Hosseini; Johan C O Richter; Peter Milos; Martin Hallbeck; Karin Wårdell Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Giuseppe Catapano; Francesco Giovanni Sgulò; Vincenzo Seneca; Giuseppina Iorio; Matteo de Notaris; Giuseppe di Nuzzo Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Aaron E Rusheen; Abhijeet S Barath; Abhinav Goyal; J Hudson Barnett; Benjamin T Gifford; Kevin E Bennet; Charles D Blaha; Stephan J Goerss; Yoonbae Oh; Kendall H Lee Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 5.379