Literature DB >> 19429113

Using scanning trials to assess intrinsic coordination dynamics.

Attila J Kovacs1, John J Buchanan, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

Bimanual 1:1 coordination patterns other than in-phase (0 degrees ) and anti-phase (180 degrees ) have proven difficult to perform even with extended practice. The difficulty has been attributed to phase attraction that draws the coordination between the limbs towards the bimanual patterns of in-phase and anti-phase and variability associated with the activation of non-homologous muscles via crossed and uncrossed cortical pathways. We found participants could very effectively produce a large range of supposedly unstable coordination patterns (between 0 degrees and 180 degrees in 30 degrees increments) after only 3 min of practice when integrated feedback (Lissajous plots) was provided and other perceptual and attentional distractions were minimized. These findings clearly indicate that the perception-action system is fully capable of producing a wide range of bimanual coordination patterns and that the reason for the failure to produce these patterns in previous experiments reside in the perceptual information and attentional requirements typically found in experimental testing environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19429113     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  19 in total

1.  Bimanual Fitts' tasks: Kelso, Southard, and Goodman, 1979 revisited.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Jason Boyle; Attila J Kovacs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

4.  Amplitude differences, spatial assimilation, and integrated feedback in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Do accuracy requirements change bimanual and unimanual control processes similarly?

Authors:  Chaoyi Wang; Jason B Boyle; Boyi Dai; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Perceptuo-motor learning rate declines by half from 20s to 70/80s.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; Winona Snapp-Childs; Andrew D Wilson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The role of auditory and visual models in the production of bimanual tapping patterns.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The simplest acquisition protocol is sometimes the best protocol: performing and learning a 1:2 bimanual coordination task.

Authors:  Stefan Panzer; Deanna Kennedy; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effect of inherent and incidental constraints on bimanual and social coordination.

Authors:  Yiyu Wang; Osmar Pinto Neto; Madison M Davis; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Off-line learning in a rhythmic bimanual task: early feedback dependency is reduced over wakefulness.

Authors:  A T McCulloch; I Park; D L Wright; John J Buchanan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.