BACKGROUND: Among health professionals, there is wide variation in the practice of disclosing a diagnosis of dementia to patients. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of one theory-based and two pragmatic interventions on intention to perform three behaviors, namely (1) finding out what the patient already knows or suspects about their diagnosis; (2) using the actual words "dementia" or "Alzheimer's disease" when talking to the patient (i.e., the use of explicit terminology); (3) exploring what the diagnosis means to the patient. METHOD: Within an intervention-modeling process, members of old-age mental health teams in England were sent postal questionnaires measuring psychological variables. Respondents were randomized by team to one of four groups to receive: theory-based intervention; evidence-based communication; patient-based intervention; or no intervention (control). Interventions were delivered as pen-and-paper exercises at the start of a second postal questionnaire that remeasured the same psychological variables. The outcome measures were intention and scenario-based behavioral simulation. RESULTS:Responses were received from 644 of 1,103 (58%) individuals from 179 of 205 (87%) mental health teams. There were no significant differences in terms of intention or simulated behavior between the trial groups. The theory-based intervention significantly increased scores for attitudes to (p = 0.03) and perceived behavioral control (p = 0.001) for the behavior of "finding out what the patient already knows or suspects about their diagnosis." CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had a limited effect. This may be partly explained by clinical or methodological factors. The use of a systematic intervention modeling process allows clearer understanding of the next appropriate steps which should involve further evaluation of the interventions using an interactive delivery method in a less selected group of study participants.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Among health professionals, there is wide variation in the practice of disclosing a diagnosis of dementia to patients. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of one theory-based and two pragmatic interventions on intention to perform three behaviors, namely (1) finding out what the patient already knows or suspects about their diagnosis; (2) using the actual words "dementia" or "Alzheimer's disease" when talking to the patient (i.e., the use of explicit terminology); (3) exploring what the diagnosis means to the patient. METHOD: Within an intervention-modeling process, members of old-age mental health teams in England were sent postal questionnaires measuring psychological variables. Respondents were randomized by team to one of four groups to receive: theory-based intervention; evidence-based communication; patient-based intervention; or no intervention (control). Interventions were delivered as pen-and-paper exercises at the start of a second postal questionnaire that remeasured the same psychological variables. The outcome measures were intention and scenario-based behavioral simulation. RESULTS: Responses were received from 644 of 1,103 (58%) individuals from 179 of 205 (87%) mental health teams. There were no significant differences in terms of intention or simulated behavior between the trial groups. The theory-based intervention significantly increased scores for attitudes to (p = 0.03) and perceived behavioral control (p = 0.001) for the behavior of "finding out what the patient already knows or suspects about their diagnosis." CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had a limited effect. This may be partly explained by clinical or methodological factors. The use of a systematic intervention modeling process allows clearer understanding of the next appropriate steps which should involve further evaluation of the interventions using an interactive delivery method in a less selected group of study participants.
Authors: Debbie Bonetti; Martin Eccles; Marie Johnston; Nick Steen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Rachel Baker; Anne Walker; Nigel Pitts Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2004-12-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jan Lecouturier; Claire Bamford; Julian C Hughes; Jillian J Francis; Robbie Foy; Marie Johnston; Martin P Eccles Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Robbie Foy; Jillian J Francis; Marie Johnston; Martin Eccles; Jan Lecouturier; Claire Bamford; Jeremy Grimshaw Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-12-19 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Melissa C Brouwers; Michelle E Kho; George P Browman; Jako S Burgers; Francoise Cluzeau; Gene Feder; Béatrice Fervers; Ian D Graham; Steven E Hanna; Julie Makarski Journal: CMAJ Date: 2010-05-31 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Rebecca Walwyn; Robbie Foy; Alexandra Wright-Hughes; Thomas A Willis; Stephanie Wilson; Ana Weller; Fabiana Lorencatto; Mohamed Althaf; Valentine Seymour; Amanda J Farrin; Jillian Francis; Jamie Brehaut; Noah Ivers; Sarah L Alderson; Benjamin C Brown; Richard G Feltbower; Chris P Gale; Simon J Stanworth; Suzanne Hartley; Heather Colquhoun; Justin Presseau Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 7.960
Authors: Martin P Eccles; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Graeme MacLennan; Debbie Bonetti; Liz Glidewell; Nigel B Pitts; Nick Steen; Ruth Thomas; Anne Walker; Marie Johnston Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 7.327