Literature DB >> 24550477

Comparative efficiency and driving range of light- and heavy-duty vehicles powered with biomass energy stored in liquid fuels or batteries.

Mark Laser1, Lee R Lynd.   

Abstract

This study addresses the question, "When using cellulosic biomass for vehicular transportation, which field-to-wheels pathway is more efficient: that using biofuels or that using bioelectricity?" In considering the question, the level of assumed technological maturity significantly affects the comparison, as does the intended transportation application. Results from the analysis indicate that for light-duty vehicles, over ranges typical in the United States today (e.g., 560-820 miles), field-to-wheels performance is similar, with some scenarios showing biofuel to be more efficient, and others indicating the two pathways to be essentially the same. Over the current range of heavy-duty vehicles, the field-to-wheels efficiency is higher for biofuels than for electrically powered vehicles. Accounting for technological advances and range, there is little basis to expect mature bioelectricity-powered vehicles to have greater field-to-wheels efficiency (e.g., kilometers per gigajoule biomass or per hectare) compared with mature biofuel-powered vehicles.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24550477      PMCID: PMC3948293          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314039111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy.

Authors:  Mathis Wackernagel; Niels B Schulz; Diana Deumling; Alejandro Callejas Linares; Martin Jenkins; Valerie Kapos; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan Loh; Norman Myers; Richard Norgaard; Jørgen Randers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Greater transportation energy and GHG offsets from bioelectricity than ethanol.

Authors:  J E Campbell; D B Lobell; C B Field
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Energy. Driving on biomass.

Authors:  John Ohlrogge; Doug Allen; Bill Berguson; Dean Dellapenna; Yair Shachar-Hill; Sten Stymne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of four glycosyl residue composition methods for effectiveness in detecting sugars from cell walls of dicot and grass tissues.

Authors:  Ajaya K Biswal; Li Tan; Melani A Atmodjo; Jaclyn DeMartini; Ivana Gelineo-Albersheim; Kimberly Hunt; Ian M Black; Sushree S Mohanty; David Ryno; Charles E Wyman; Debra Mohnen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 6.040

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.