Literature DB >> 1942279

Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: accuracy of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system, and role of lymphangiography, computerized tomography scan and fine needle aspiration cytology.

S Horenblas1, H Van Tinteren, J F Delemarre, L M Moonen, V Lustig, R Kröger.   

Abstract

Among 118 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis treated at our cancer institute between 1956 and 1989, we analyzed the accuracy of classification, using the tumor, nodes and metastasis system. We analyzed the role of lymphography, computerized tomography and fine needle aspiration cytology as additional staging procedures. The primary tumor (T category) was classified incorrectly in 26% of the cases. Overstaging was noted in 10% of the cases because of unsuspected infiltration and overstaging was noted in 16%. Overstaging occurred because of edema and infection masking the actual size and giving a misconception of infiltration, and also because of primary presentation as large exophytic tumors with no or minimal histopathological infiltration. When the regional lymph nodes were categorized simply as positive or negative 80% of the tumors were classified correctly and 20% incorrectly (13% were false positive and 7% were false negative). Regional lymph node invasion that escaped clinical examination was not detected by any imaging examination or fine needle aspiration cytology study. Positive findings were found only in patients with clinically suspected nodes. The classification of regional nodes by clinical examination only is hardly improved by additional imaging studies. Clinical decisions with respect to the management of regional lymph nodes should not be based on negative findings of lymphangiography, computerized tomography or fine needle aspiration cytology. In patients with proved metastasis additional imaging may be of some help in the detection of pelvic node invasion and the determination of the extent of involvement. We recommend lymphangiography as the examination of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1942279     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38068-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive and minimally invasive staging of regional lymph nodes in penile cancer.

Authors:  Ben Hughes; Joost Leijte; Majid Shabbir; Nick Watkin; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Lymphoscintigraphy in penile cancer: limited value of sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes.

Authors:  E Hungerhuber; B Schlenker; D Frimberger; R Linke; A Karl; C G Stief; P Schneede
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  What next? Managing lymph nodes in men with penile cancer.

Authors:  Michael Leveridge; D Robert Siemens; Christopher Morash
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  The risk factors for the presence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma patients with inguinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Jian-Ye Liu; Yong-Hong Li; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Kai Yao; Yun-Lin Ye; Dan Xie; Hui Han; Zhou-Wei Liu; Zi-Ke Qin; Fang-Jian Zhou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Fluorescence diagnosis: a novel method to guide radical inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.

Authors:  D Frimberger; R Linke; H Meissner; H Stepp; D Zaak; E Hungerhuber; R Waidelich; N Schmeller; A Hofstetter; P Schneede
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  A dramatic case of genital radionecrosis.

Authors:  José Guzmán-Esquivel; Ivan Delgado-Enciso; Héctor Solano-Moreno
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer.

Authors:  Jose Gustavo Ramos; David Camilo Jaramillo; David Sandoval; Laura Juliana Gallego; Carlos Riveros; Jonathan Armando Sierra; Isis Vargas; Byron Eduardo López De Mesa López; Linda Ibata; Rodolfo Varela
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Metastatic penile carcinoma - an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options.

Authors:  Dimitri Barski; Evangelos Georgas; Holger Gerullis; Thorsten Ecke
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-06-23

9.  Role of dynamic sentinel node biopsy in carcinoma penis with or without palpable nodes.

Authors:  N Kathiresan; Anand Raja; Krishna Kumar Ramachandran; Shirley Sundersingh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Atypical Chest Pain: An Unusual Presentation of Spinal Metastasis due to Penile Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah Pywell; Shumaila Hasan; Mohammad Zain Sohail; Georgios Mamarelis; Cameron Dott; Mohammad Taimur Khan; Naveethan Sivanadarajah
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2016-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.