Literature DB >> 21735285

[Extraesophageal reflux. Overview and discussion of a new method for pH monitoring].

M Jungheim1, M Ptok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extraesophageal reflux disease often requires diagnosis and treatment by a phoniatry or ear, nose and throat specialist. The disease needs to be differentiated from gastroesophageal reflux disease.
OBJECTIVE: A new oropharyngeal pH measuring system with a single channel probe has recently been introduced. The aim of this study was to compare oropharyngeal pH-metry with the existing diagnostic methods for extraesophageal reflux disease and to present initial results in our own patients.
METHODS: A literature search for oropharyngeal pH-metry was performed in the databases NHS EED, HTA, DARE, Clinical trials, Cochrane reviews and Medline/PubMed. A selective literature search was also carried out on the problem of extraesophageal reflux disease.
RESULTS: Evaluation scales, trial proton pump inhibitor therapy or pH-metry, for example, can be used to diagnose extraesophageal reflux disease. pH-metry can be performed using a classical two-channel pH-metry system; a new oropharyngeal pH measuring system has recently been introduced. This new method has been evaluated in initial studies for normative data and has been compared to two-channel pH-metry. Prospective randomised studies to diagnose extraesophageal reflux disease with the new oropharyngeal pH-metry method are still lacking. DISCUSSION: Oropharyngeal pH-metry has some potential advantages compared to classical two-channel pH-metry; however, a lot of questions remain unanswered. These will be discussed and illustrated with the help of a number of own patient case reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735285     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-011-2329-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  38 in total

Review 1.  [Topic complex II: Diagnosis].

Authors:  S Müller-Lissner; C Fibbe; T Frieling; M Jung
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Normal values for pharyngeal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Neil N Chheda; Melanie W Seybt; Robert R Schade; Gregory N Postma
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Pepsin and carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme III as diagnostic markers for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Authors:  Nikki Johnston; John Knight; Peter W Dettmar; Mark O Lively; Jamie Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  J E Richter
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-11-24       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Pepsin as a causal agent of inflammation during nonacidic reflux.

Authors:  Tina L Samuels; Nikki Johnston
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Mucin gene expression in human laryngeal epithelia: effect of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Tina L Samuels; Ethan Handler; Michael L Syring; Nicholas M Pajewski; Joel H Blumin; Joseph E Kerschner; Nikki Johnston
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Is pseudosulcus alone a reliable sign of gastroesophago-pharyngeal reflux?

Authors:  R Ylitalo; P-A Lindestad; S Hertegard
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2004-02

8.  [The need for 24-h double probe pH monitoring in the diagnosis of laryngo-pharyngeal reflux].

Authors:  P Jecker; R Schuon; W J Mann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Role of gastroesophageal reflux in pediatric upper airway disorders.

Authors:  L A Halstead
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI).

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Gregory N Postma; James A Koufman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Laryngopharyngeal reflux and larynx-related symptoms].

Authors:  M Ptok; A Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Relationship between functional endoscopy and impedance-pH measurement.

Authors:  F Michel; T Stroh; R Fritsche; P Ahrens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Relationship between functional endoscopy and impedance-pH measurement. German version].

Authors:  F Michel; T Stroh; R Fritsche; P Ahrens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Pharyngeal acid load and different functional endoscopy findings].

Authors:  F Michel; R Dannesberger; T Stroh; R Fritsche; P Ahrens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.284

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.