Literature DB >> 11850748

Is adiposity at normal body weight relevant for cardiovascular disease risk?

S Tanaka1, K Togashi, T Rankinen, L Pérusse, A S Leon, D C Rao, J S Skinner, J H Wilmore, C Bouchard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between adiposity and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in normal weight (NW) individuals.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study using the sample of white people, aged from 17 to 60 y from the Québec Family Study and the Heritage Family Study. NW subjects with a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 25 kg/m(2) (181 males and 265 females) and overweight (OW) subjects with a BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m(2) (133 males and 114 females) were retained for this study. NW subjects were divided into quintiles of each adiposity variable, then the quintiles and the OW group were evaluated for the presence of CVD risk factors. Using logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for the prevalence of risk factors for each quintile of each adiposity variable and the OW group was estimated relative to the first quintile in NW subjects. Mean values of adiposity variables were compared between the subjects with and without risk factors. In these analyses, age and study cohort effects were taken into account. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage body fat (%fat) and fat mass (FM) measured by underwater weighing were available as adiposity variables. Risk factors included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and fasting glucose.
RESULTS: Wide ranges of values were observed for adiposity variables. HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and fasting glucose in NW males and HDL cholesterol in NW females were significantly correlated with all adiposity variables. For males, higher quintiles of adiposity variables in the NW group and the OW group tended to have higher ORs compared to the first quintiles for the risk factor variables. The fifth quintiles of all adiposity variables had the highest ORs (3.15 for %fat and 3.77 for FM) and they were significantly different from the first quintiles. OW males had ORs similar to those of the fifth quintiles for the risk factor variables. On the other hand, for females, the relatively linear associations were less clear in the NW group. In NW males, the subjects with at least one risk factor had significantly higher %fat and FM than the subjects without risk factors. In NW females, no significant difference was observed for these adiposity variables between the subjects with and without risk factors.
CONCLUSION: NW males with elevated adiposity had higher prevalence of risk factors than NW males with less adiposity and the prevalence in the former was rather similar to that seen in OW males. On the other hand, measures of adiposity added little additional information to the BMI classification of NW on CVD risk factors in females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11850748     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  15 in total

1.  Measurement of the distance and angle between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery: normal values in different BMI categories.

Authors:  Huseyin Ozkurt; Merve Meltem Cenker; Nagihan Bas; Sukru Mehmet Erturk; Muzaffer Basak
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Relation of body mass index and skinfold thicknesses to cardiovascular disease risk factors in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  David S Freedman; Peter T Katzmarzyk; William H Dietz; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Gerald S Berenson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Predicting adult body mass index-specific metabolic risk from childhood.

Authors:  Sarah M Camhi; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Stephanie Broyles; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Wei Chen; Claude Bouchard; Gerald S Berenson
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Role of Obesity Variables in Detecting Hypertension in an Iranian Population.

Authors:  Patricia Khashayar; Hamidreza Aghaei Meybodi; Mohsen Rezaei Hemami; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-06-22

5.  Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome burden in adolescents--Penn State Children Cohort study.

Authors:  Fan He; Sol Rodriguez-Colon; Julio Fernandez-Mendoza; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Edward O Bixler; Arthur Berg; Yuka Imamura Kawasawa; Marjorie D Sawyer; Duanping Liao
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Healthy obese persons: how can they be identified and do metabolic profiles stratify risk?

Authors:  Gerald V Denis; James A Hamilton
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  Obesity phenotype and coronary heart disease risk as estimated by the Framingham risk score.

Authors:  Yong Soon Park; Jun-Su Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  To treat or not to treat: comparison of different criteria used to determine whether weight loss is to be recommended.

Authors:  Ottavia Colombo; Simona Villani; Giovanna Pinelli; Claudia Trentani; Maurizia Baldi; Orazio Tomarchio; Anna Tagliabue
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Relationship between Low Muscle Mass and Metabolic Syndrome in Elderly People with Normal Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Moon; Se Ryung Choo; Jong Seung Kim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2015-08-31

10.  Body mass index, waist-circumference and cardiovascular disease risk factors in Iranian adults: Isfahan healthy heart program.

Authors:  Noushin Mohammadifard; Masoud Nazem; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Fatemeh Nouri; Firouzeh Sajjadi; Maryam Maghroun; Hassan Alikhasi
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.