Literature DB >> 19415397

The esophageal anastomosis: traditional methods to prevent leak.

Daniel P Raymond1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19415397     DOI： 10.1007/s11605-009-0907-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN： 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


× No keyword cloud information.
  20 in total

1.  Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Intraoperative scanning laser Doppler flowmetry in the assessment of gastric tube perfusion during esophageal resection.

Authors:  N H Boyle; A Pearce; D Hunter; W J Owen; R C Mason
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  John D Mitchell
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.750

4.  Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Sina Ercan; Thomas W Rice; Sudish C Murthy; Lisa A Rybicki; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy.

Authors:  Sadik Yildirim; Hakan Köksal; Fevzi Celayir; Levent Erdem; Muharrem Oner; Adil Baykan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: a 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients.

Authors:  Rafe C Connors; Brian C Reuben; Leigh A Neumayer; David A Bull
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  M Rutegård; J Lagergren; I Rouvelas; M Lindblad; J M Blazeby; P Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer: a mortality-free experience.

Authors:  Abeezar I Sarela; Damian J Tolan; Keith Harris; Simon P Dexter; Henry M Sue-Ling
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Peter B Bach; Deborah Schrag; Manjit S Bains; Alan D Turnbull; Martin Karpeh; Murray F Brennan; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.113
View more
  2 in total

1.  Application of Oesophagogastric Cervical Mechanical Anastomosis in Oesophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Ning Zhang; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal-cardiac cancer.

Authors:  Jinxi Huang; Yi Zhou; Chenghu Wang; Weiwei Yuan; Zhandong Zhang; Beibei Chen; Xiefu Zhang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.500
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.