Literature DB >> 19415390

Relationship between organizational factors and performance among pay-for-performance hospitals.

Ernest R Vina1, David C Rhew, Scott R Weingarten, Jason B Weingarten, John T Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)/Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration (HQID) project aims to improve clinical performance through a pay-for-performance program. We conducted this study to identify the key organizational factors associated with higher performance.
METHODS: An investigator-blinded, structured telephone survey of eligible hospitals' (N = 92) quality improvement (QI) leaders was conducted among HQID hospitals in the top 2 or bottom 2 deciles submitting performance measure data from October 2004 to September 2005. The survey covered topics such as QI interventions, data feedback, physician leadership, support for QI efforts, and organizational culture.
RESULTS: More top performing hospitals used clinical pathways for the treatment of AMI (49% vs. 15%, p < 0.01), HF (44% vs. 18%, p < 0.01), PN (38% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) and THR/TKR (56% vs. 23%, p < 0.01); organized into multidisciplinary teams to manage patients with AMI (93% vs. 77%, p < 0.05) and HF (93% vs. 69%, p < 0.01); used order sets for the treatment of THR/TKR (91% vs. 64%, p < 0.01); and implemented computerized physician order entry in the hospital (24.4% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.05). Finally, more top performers reported having adequate human resources for QI projects (p < 0.01); support of the nursing staff to increase adherence to quality indicators (p < 0.01); and an organizational culture that supported coordination of care (p < 0.01), pace of change (p < 0.01), willingness to try new projects (p < 0.01), and a focus on identifying system errors rather than blaming individuals (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Organizational structure, support, and culture are associated with high performance among hospitals participating in a pay-for-performance demonstration project. Multiple organizational factors remain important in optimizing clinical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19415390      PMCID: PMC2695536          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-0997-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  41 in total

1.  A statewide initiative to improve the care of hospitalized pneumonia patients: The Connecticut Pneumonia Pathway Project.

Authors:  T P Meehan; S R Weingarten; E S Holmboe; D Mathur; Y Wang; M K Petrillo; G S Tu; J M Fine
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Critical pathways for management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: an assessment by the National Heart Attack Alert Program.

Authors:  Christopher P Cannon; Mary H Hand; Raymond Bahr; William E Boden; Robert Christenson; W Brian Gibler; Kim Eagle; Costas T Lambrew; Thomas H Lee; Bruce MacLeod; Joseph P Ornato; Harry P Selker; Pamela Steele; Robert J Zalenski
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Assessing the impact of total quality management and organizational culture on multiple outcomes of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.

Authors:  S M Shortell; R H Jones; A W Rademaker; R R Gillies; D S Dranove; E F Hughes; P P Budetti; K S Reynolds; C F Huang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A qualitative study of increasing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction: Why do some hospitals succeed?

Authors:  E H Bradley; E S Holmboe; J A Mattera; S A Roumanis; M J Radford; H M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients.

Authors:  P R Dexter; S Perkins; J M Overhage; K Maharry; R B Kohler; C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Implementing evidence-based medicine: the role of market pressures, compensation incentives, and culture in physician organizations.

Authors:  S M Shortell; J L Zazzali; L R Burns; J A Alexander; R R Gillies; P P Budetti; T M Waters; H S Zuckerman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Multidisciplinary rounds (MDR): an implementation system for sustained improvement in the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines program.

Authors:  Gray Ellrodt; Rick Glasener; Brenda Cadorette; Karen Kradel; Claire Bercury; Alicia Ferrarin; Deborah Jewell; Carol Frechette; Pat Seckler; Jane Reed; Albert Langou; Neelima Surapaneni
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2007-09

8.  Impact of human factor design on the use of order sets in the treatment of congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Stewart Reingold; Erik Kulstad
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Influence of a performance-improvement initiative on quality of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure: results of the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF).

Authors:  Gregg C Fonarow; William T Abraham; Nancy M Albert; Wendy Gattis Stough; Mihai Gheorghiade; Barry H Greenberg; Christopher M O'Connor; Karen Pieper; Jie Lena Sun; Clyde W Yancy; James B Young
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-23

10.  The impact of standardized order sets and intensive clinical case management on outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Steven Fishbane; Michael S Niederman; Colleen Daly; Adam Magin; Masateru Kawabata; André de Corla-Souza; Irum Choudhery; Gerald Brody; Maureen Gaffney; Simcha Pollack; Suzanne Parker
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007 Aug 13-27
View more
  5 in total

1.  Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.

Authors:  Cheryl L Damberg; Melony E Sorbero; Susan L Lovejoy; Grant R Martsolf; Laura Raaen; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-12-30

Review 2.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.

Authors:  Pieter Van Herck; Delphine De Smedt; Lieven Annemans; Roy Remmen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Walter Sermeus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Family Physician Readiness for Value-Based Payments: Does Ownership Status Matter?

Authors:  Heidy Robertson-Cooper; Bradley Neaderhiser; Laura E Happe; Roy A Beveridge
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates.

Authors:  Gill Combes; Kerry Allen; Kim Sein; Alan Girling; Richard Lilford
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.