Literature DB >> 17698690

The impact of standardized order sets and intensive clinical case management on outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia.

Steven Fishbane1, Michael S Niederman, Colleen Daly, Adam Magin, Masateru Kawabata, André de Corla-Souza, Irum Choudhery, Gerald Brody, Maureen Gaffney, Simcha Pollack, Suzanne Parker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia is a frequent cause for hospital admission that results in significant costs to the health care system. The length of hospital stay (LOS) affects costs as well as risk for nosocomial medical complications. The purpose of this study was to test whether the addition of intensive clinical case management to clinical guidelines could lead to a reduction in LOS that was not achievable by guidelines alone, while maintaining quality of care.
METHODS: Patients were studied in 3 sequential blocks at a single hospital from November 2002 to February 2005. Block 1 patients (n = 110) were given conventional treatment. For block 2 (n = 119), guidelines and/or standardized order sets (SOSs) were used supported by intensive clinical case management (ICCM) (full variance tracking with concurrent feedback and reminders). The ICCM interventions were conducted by resident physicians. For block 3 (n = 115), all orders were written with guidelines and/or SOSs but without ICCM.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD time to clinical stability was not significantly different between the groups (block 1, 3.3 +/- 1.4 days; block 2, 3.2 +/- 1.2 days; and block 3, 3.4 +/- 1.3 days). The mean LOS was significantly lower in block 2 (5.3 +/- 3.5 days) than in blocks 1 (8.8 +/- 4.4 days) (P<.001) and 3 (7.3 +/- 3.9 days) (P<.01) and significantly lower in block 3 than in block 1 (P = .05). Time to change to oral antibiotics was earlier in block 2 (3.7 +/- 0.9 days) than in blocks 1 and 3 (5.7 +/- 2.4 and 5.0 +/- 1.9 days, respectively) (P<.001). The mean time from clinical stability to hospital discharge was significantly shorter for block 2 (2.1 +/- 2.2 days) than for blocks 1 (5.3 +/- 4.4 days) (P<.001) and 3 (4.9 +/- 4.2 days) (P<.001). Patients in block 2 had a greater proportion with progressive ambulation (P<.001), pneumococcal (P<.001) or influenza vaccination (P<.01), deep-venous thrombosis prophylaxis (P = .01), and smoking cessation counseling (P = .01). There was no significant difference between the blocks in mortality or hospital readmission rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined intervention of SOS plus ICCM led to a substantial reduction in LOS while maintaining quality of care. The main effect occurred by reducing the time from clinical stability to discharge, which appeared to be the key "modifiable" process of care adding to a prolonged LOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698690     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.15.1664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  10 in total

1.  Improving the utilization of admission order sets in a computerized physician order entry system by integrating modular disease specific order subsets into a general medicine admission order set.

Authors:  Rajika L Munasinghe; Camelia Arsene; Tarun K Abraham; Marwan Zidan; Mohamed Siddique
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Use of order sets in inpatient computerized provider order entry systems: a comparative analysis of usage patterns at seven sites.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Joshua C Feblowitz; Justine E Pang; James D Carpenter; Michael A Krall; Blackford Middleton; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Factors associated with 30-day mortality in elderly inpatients with community acquired pneumonia during 2 influenza seasons.

Authors:  Núria Torner; Conchita Izquierdo; Núria Soldevila; Diana Toledo; Judith Chamorro; Elena Espejo; Amelia Fernández-Sierra; Angela Domínguez
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Lessons learned from 2 decades of CAP therapy data: ways to improve patient management.

Authors:  Michael T Bender; Michael S Niederman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Machine Learning for Health.

Authors:  Marzyeh Ghassemi; Tristan Naumann; Peter Schulam; Andrew L Beam; Irene Y Chen; Rajesh Ranganath
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2020-05-30

6.  Relationship between organizational factors and performance among pay-for-performance hospitals.

Authors:  Ernest R Vina; David C Rhew; Scott R Weingarten; Jason B Weingarten; John T Chang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  How to handle mortality when investigating length of hospital stay and time to clinical stability.

Authors:  Guy N Brock; Christopher Barnes; Julio A Ramirez; John Myers
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Geographical differences exist in high-value care delivery for inpatient management of cirrhosis: Cost conscious care in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Lindsay A Sobotka; Alice Hinton; Lanla F Conteh
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2018-09-04

9.  When order sets do not align with clinician workflow: assessing practice patterns in the electronic health record.

Authors:  Ron C Li; Jason K Wang; Christopher Sharp; Jonathan H Chen
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to a cardiology vs non-cardiology service: variations in treatment & outcome.

Authors:  Deirdre E O'Neill; Danielle A Southern; Colleen M Norris; Blair J O'Neill; Helen J Curran; Michelle M Graham
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.