Literature DB >> 17804970

Multidisciplinary rounds (MDR): an implementation system for sustained improvement in the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines program.

Gray Ellrodt1, Rick Glasener, Brenda Cadorette, Karen Kradel, Claire Bercury, Alicia Ferrarin, Deborah Jewell, Carol Frechette, Pat Seckler, Jane Reed, Albert Langou, Neelima Surapaneni.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hospitals throughout the United States face the challenge of developing implementation systems able to sustain improved clinical care over years. The American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines (GWTGs) program helps hospitals address this challenge with a comprehensive approach to quality improvement for patients with CAD, heart failure and stroke. The Department of Medicine at Berkshire Medical Center, a 300-bed community teaching hospital, developed a clinical care improvement implementation system called multidisciplinary rounds (MDR). We report our performance in GWTGs using MDR.
METHODS: MDR is a patient-focused communication system integrating care delivered by multiple providers using concurrent feedback, redundancy, and rapid cycle improvement. Providers from multiple disciplines meet for 1 hour 3 times per week to coordinate care and assure adherence to evidence-based guidelines for all non-ICU medical patients. Following brief focused presentations, participants view our electronic medical record (EMR) projected on screens, which includes orders, diagnoses, laboratory, medications, cardiology reports, consultations, nursing documentation, smoking and immunization status, and other information. The leaders emphasize the importance of evidence-based order sets in our computerized provider order entry system (CPOE), checklists, and tools. Specific suggestions for interventions and documentation based upon AHA/ACC guidelines are provided.
RESULTS: MDR has rapidly improved adherence to evidence-based measures in all GWTGs programs. In addition, MDR has been associated with sustained improvement in all modules. Berkshire Medical Center has received more performance achievement awards than any other hospital in the United States. These awards include 6 consecutive awards in GWTGs CAD, 3 in stroke, and 2 in heart failure. Cardiovascular process improvements have been associated with a reduction in inpatient AMI mortality from 8.75% to 5.20% (with an expected severity-adjusted mortality of 10.18%). Berkshire Medical Center provides about 80% of the acute care in Berkshire County and thus influences the outcomes of a large proportion of our community's patients. Between 1999 and 2004, Berkshire County had a 26.3% decrease in major CVD deaths compared with a Massachusetts decrease of 17.3% and a US decrease of 17.8%. We have seen a 44.4% decrease in AMI mortality, a 34.5% decrease in stroke mortality, and a 33.9% decrease in heart failure mortality. We have assisted multiple organizations in implementing GWTG and MDR.
CONCLUSIONS: MDR at Berkshire Medical Center is a clinical quality-improvement implementation system that has driven sustained high-level performance in the American Heart Association's GWTGs. MDR has changed our culture, improved coordination of care, been flexible, and facilitated rapid and sustained process improvement. Improvement in evidence-based cardiovascular processes for CAD, stroke and heart failure have been associated with improved in hospital AMI mortality and decreased overall community cardiovascular, AMI, stroke and heart failure mortality. MDR can be used by multiple organizations to drive care improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17804970     DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e318073bd3c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol        ISSN: 1535-2811


  9 in total

Review 1.  Heart Failure Management Innovation Enabled by Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  David P Kao; Katy E Trinkley; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 12.035

2.  Quality improvement of interdisciplinary rounds by leadership training based on essential quality indicators of the Interdisciplinary Rounds Assessment Scale.

Authors:  Elsbeth C M Ten Have; Raoul E Nap; Jaap E Tulleken
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Patient-centered collaborative care: the impact of a new approach to postpartum rounds on residents' perception of their work environment.

Authors:  Maureen Baldwin; Jason Hashima; Jeanne-Marie Guise; William Thomas Gregory; Alison Edelman; Sally Segel
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

4.  Hospital strategies for reducing risk-standardized mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Erica S Spatz; Jeph Herrin; Emily J Cherlin; Jeptha P Curtis; Jennifer W Thompson; Henry H Ting; Yongfei Wang; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Features of high quality discharge planning for patients following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Emily J Cherlin; Leslie A Curry; Jennifer W Thompson; S Ryan Greysen; Erica Spatz; Harlan M Krumholz; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Acute heart failure syndromes: potential strategies to improve post-discharge outcomes.

Authors:  Anne K Chung; Peter S Pang; Gregg C Fonarow; Mihai Gheorghiade
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-08

7.  Relationship between organizational factors and performance among pay-for-performance hospitals.

Authors:  Ernest R Vina; David C Rhew; Scott R Weingarten; Jason B Weingarten; John T Chang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Measurement properties and implementation of a checklist to assess leadership skills during interdisciplinary rounds in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Elsbeth C M Ten Have; Raoul E Nap; Jaap E Tulleken
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-01-29

9.  An organizational perspective on the long-term sustainability of a nursing best practice guidelines program: a case study.

Authors:  Andrea R Fleiszer; Sonia E Semenic; Judith A Ritchie; Marie-Claire Richer; Jean-Louis Denis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.