Literature DB >> 19413478

Dissociating source memory decisions in the prefrontal cortex: fMRI of diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.

David A Gallo1, Ian M McDonough, Jason Scimeca.   

Abstract

We used event-related fMRI to study two types of retrieval monitoring that regulate episodic memory accuracy: diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Diagnostic monitoring relies on expectations, whereby the failure to retrieve expected recollections prevents source memory misattributions (sometimes called the distinctiveness heuristic). Disqualifying monitoring relies on corroborative evidence, whereby the successful recollection of accurate source information prevents misattribution to an alternative source (sometimes called recall to reject). Using criterial recollection tests, we found that orienting retrieval toward distinctive recollections (colored pictures) reduced source memory misattributions compared with a control test in which retrieval was oriented toward less distinctive recollections (colored font). However, the corresponding neural activity depended on the type of monitoring engaged on these tests. Rejecting items based on the absence of picture recollections (i.e., the distinctiveness heuristic) decreased activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex relative to the control test, whereas rejecting items based on successful picture recollections (i.e., a recall-to-reject strategy) increased activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. There also was some evidence that these effects were differentially lateralized. This study provides the first neuroimaging comparison of these two recollection-based monitoring processes and advances theories of prefrontal involvement in memory retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19413478     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Age-related differences in prefrontal cortex activity during retrieval monitoring: testing the compensation and dysfunction accounts.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; Jessica T Wong; David A Gallo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

3.  Retrieval Expectations Affect False Recollection: Insights from a Criterial Recollection Task.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

4.  Experts' memory: an ERP study of perceptual expertise effects on encoding and recognition.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Tim Curran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

5.  The neural correlates of correctly rejecting lures during memory retrieval: the role of item relatedness.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The use of metacognitive strategies to decrease false memories in source monitoring in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Rebecca G Deason; Neil A Nadkarni; Michelle J Tat; Sean Flannery; Bruno Frustace; Brandon A Ally; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Effects of HD-tDCS on memory and metamemory for general knowledge questions that vary by difficulty.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Chua; Rifat Ahmed; Sandry M Garcia
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Striatal contributions to declarative memory retrieval.

Authors:  Jason M Scimeca; David Badre
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The influence of strategic encoding on false memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia.

Authors:  Michelle J Tat; Anothai Soonsawat; Corinne B Nagle; Rebecca G Deason; Maureen K O'Connor; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves memory monitoring.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Chua; Rifat Ahmed
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.