Literature DB >> 25862563

The neural correlates of correctly rejecting lures during memory retrieval: the role of item relatedness.

Caitlin R Bowman1, Nancy A Dennis.   

Abstract

Successful memory retrieval is predicated not only on recognizing old information, but also on correctly rejecting new information (lures) in order to avoid false memories. Correctly rejecting lures is more difficult when they are perceptually or semantically related to information presented at study as compared to when lures are distinct from previously studied information. This behavioral difference suggests that the cognitive and neural basis of correct rejections differs with respect to the relatedness between lures and studied items. The present study sought to identify neural activity that aids in suppressing false memories by examining the network of brain regions underlying correct rejection of related and unrelated lures. Results showed neural overlap in the right hippocampus and anterior parahippocampal gyrus associated with both related and unrelated correct rejections, indicating that some neural regions support correctly rejecting lures regardless of their semantic/perceptual characteristics. Direct comparisons between related and unrelated correct rejections showed that unrelated correct rejections were associated with greater activity in bilateral middle and inferior temporal cortices, regions that have been associated with categorical processing and semantic labels. Related correct rejections showed greater activation in visual and lateral prefrontal cortices, which have been associated with perceptual processing and retrieval monitoring. Thus, while related and unrelated correct rejections show some common neural correlates, related correct rejections are driven by greater perceptual processing whereas unrelated correct rejections show greater reliance on salient categorical cues to support quick and accurate memory decisions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25862563     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4268-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  72 in total

Review 1.  The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  C J Price
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Memory's echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex.

Authors:  M E Wheeler; S E Petersen; R L Buckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The neural origins of specific and general memory: the role of the fusiform cortex.

Authors:  Rachel J Garoff; Scott D Slotnick; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Conjunction revisited.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; William D Penny; Daniel E Glaser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  False recognition in younger and older adults: exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.

Authors:  K A Norman; D L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

6.  Neural mechanisms of semantic interference and false recognition in short-term memory.

Authors:  Alexandra S Atkins; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Differing patterns of temporal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia.

Authors:  C J Galton; K Patterson; K Graham; M A Lambon-Ralph; G Williams; N Antoun; B J Sahakian; J R Hodges
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Trusting our memories: dissociating the neural correlates of confidence in veridical versus illusory memories.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Prefrontal cortex contribution to associative recognition memory in humans: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Martin Lepage; Mathieu Brodeur; Pierre Bourgouin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Age-related differences in brain activity during true and false memory retrieval.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Hongkeun Kim; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  5 in total

1.  Angular Gyrus Involvement at Encoding and Retrieval Is Associated with Durable But Less Specific Memories.

Authors:  Marieke van der Linden; Ruud M W J Berkers; Richard G M Morris; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Saccade-induced retrieval enhancement and the recovery of perceptual item-specific information.

Authors:  Andrew Parker; Jolyon Poole; Neil Dagnall
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-12-16

3.  Differential Functional Connectivity along the Long Axis of the Hippocampus Aligns with Differential Role in Memory Specificity and Generalization.

Authors:  Lea E Frank; Caitlin R Bowman; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Generalization and False Memory in an Acquired Equivalence Paradigm: The Influence of Physical Resemblance Across Related Episodes.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Maria-Alejandra de Araujo Sanchez; William Hou; Sarina Rubin; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-08-20

5.  Memory Distortion and Its Avoidance: An Event-Related Potentials Study on False Recognition and Correct Rejection.

Authors:  Sara Cadavid; Maria Soledad Beato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.