Literature DB >> 19413474

Single-trial EEG power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition.

Kentaro Yamanaka1, Yoshiharu Yamamoto.   

Abstract

Human voluntary response inhibition has frequently been investigated using go/no-go RT tasks. Recent studies have indicated that not only the traditional averaging waveforms of EEG activities (ERPs) but also the power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG are important in studying the neural correlates of various human cognitive functions. Therefore, here, we aimed to undertake a detailed study of the time/frequency power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG during go/no-go RT tasks, with focus particularly on the no-go-specific power and phase dynamics, which are presumed to involve the voluntary response inhibition processes. Thus, we demonstrated no-go-specific theta band EEG power increases and intertrial phase-locking in the midline-frontal areas, which are related to no-go-specific midline-frontal negative-positive ERP waveforms (no-go N2/no-go P3). In addition, we observed no-go-specific alpha band EEG intertrial phase-locking with an adjacent dephasing phenomenon, which is mainly associated with the early part of no-go N2. The estimated time point when the no-go-specific midline-frontal dephasing phenomenon occurred corresponded to the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold). Moreover, the no-go-specific phase dynamics in the midline-frontal areas just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency, unlike the power modulations, were affected by changes in the no-go stimulus probability, suggesting the dependence of only phase dynamics on no-go stimulus probability. From these results, we conclude that the complex power and phase dynamics of the theta and alpha band EEG in the midline-frontal areas are specific to no-go trials, being the underlying bases of the no-go-specific ERP waveforms, and suggest that the phase dynamics just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency may involve, at least, the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19413474     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  27 in total

1.  Removing an intersubject variance component in a general linear model improves multiway factoring of event-related spectral perturbations in group EEG studies.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Spence; Matthew R Brier; John Hart; Thomas C Ferree
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Unexpected events induce motor slowing via a brain mechanism for action-stopping with global suppressive effects.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural oscillatory dynamics of inhibitory control in young adult binge drinkers.

Authors:  Lee A Holcomb; Siyuan Huang; Stephen M Cruz; Ksenija Marinkovic
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Stimulus sequence context differentially modulates inhibition-related theta and delta band activity in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  It's not too late: the onset of the frontocentral P3 indexes successful response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Impact of alcohol use on EEG dynamics of response inhibition: a cotwin control analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; William G Iacono
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.280

7.  Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control.

Authors:  Jakob Kaiser; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Inhibitory motor control based on complex stopping goals relies on the same brain network as simple stopping.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Structural brain correlates of sensorimotor gating in antipsychotic-naive men with first-episode schizophrenia.

Authors:  Trine Bjørg Hammer; Bob Oranje; Arnold Skimminge; Bodil Aggernæs; Bjørn H Ebdrup; Birte Glenthøj; William Baaré
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.186

10.  Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.